#
CIPS remains China's principal cross-border RMB settlement infrastructure, expanding participants (193 direct/1,573 indirect by end-2025) while volume growth slows sharply and RMB SWIFT share stays low (~3%).
Outlook
The CBETS launch and e-CNY interest-bearing reclassification signal accelerating state investment in cross-border digital-yuan settlement infrastructure as a strategic counterweight to correspondent-banking access tightening elsewhere in the corridor. Watch for further direct-participant additions to CBETS and for whether the interest-bearing reclassification measurably shifts wallet balances relative to bank deposits over the coming cycles.
Payment Corridor Dynamics
China's Cross-Border Interbank Payment System posted a record average daily transaction value of RMB 920.5bn, approximately $133.5bn, in March 2026, up 20 percent year-on-year, according to vendor analytics tracking published CIPS statistics. Volume subsequently tapered to RMB 674bn by May 2026, indicating the March peak was event-driven rather than a permanently rebased volume floor. The identified driver of the March surge is Middle East yuan-oil-settlement demand, consistent with a broader pattern of oil-exporting counterparties increasingly settling crude transactions in yuan through the CIPS corridor rather than through dollar-denominated clearing. No primary PBOC circular text or PBOC's own CIPS statistics page was retrieved directly this cycle; the volume and participant figures rely on vendor analytics (fxcintel) and state-media secondary reporting (China Daily), a sourcing gap noted explicitly in this cycle's gaps register.
The corridor dynamics here should be read in conjunction with the structural participant-base expansion tracked separately under correspondent banking: a growing volume base on a network whose direct-participant footprint is simultaneously expanding into Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia suggests the yuan-settlement corridor is deepening geographically as well as in transaction value. The bank-versus-non-bank distinction is material here: CIPS participation, both the volume and the participant growth, runs through the bank/PSP channel rather than through non-bank payment institutions, which face a distinct regulatory posture (see the e-CNY reserve-ratio treatment under Product Innovation).
Outlook
Watch whether the March 2026 volume record proves to be a durable step-change once further months of data are available, or whether the taper to RMB 674bn by May confirms it as an event-driven spike tied specifically to Middle East settlement demand following geopolitical developments affecting Iranian crude flows. A primary PBOC data source for CIPS statistics, if it becomes available, would materially improve confidence in this corridor's trajectory assessment.
1 earlier distinct update(s)
Payment Corridor Dynamics
China's cross-border renminbi settlement infrastructure advanced on multiple fronts this cycle, alongside a structural change to the digital yuan's monetary character. From 2026-01-01, the PBOC began permitting commercial banks to pay interest on verified digital-yuan wallets, reclassifying e-CNY as a deposit-like instrument carrying full deposit-insurance coverage, while requiring non-bank payment firms handling e-CNY to hold 100 percent reserves in digital yuan. This is an Assessed-confidence, High-impact, Tier-3-sourced finding that shifts e-CNY's practical character from a pure payment instrument toward something closer to an interest-bearing deposit product, with a corresponding asymmetric reserve burden falling on non-bank payment firms rather than banks.
In June 2026, 26 financial institutions — including Standard Chartered China and overseas branches of Chinese banks in Thailand, Singapore, Laos and Qatar — signed direct-participant agreements for the PBOC-managed Cross-Border e-CNY Transfer Service, a new correspondent-style settlement platform for cross-border digital-yuan transfers. This expands the institutional footprint of e-CNY beyond domestic retail use into cross-border settlement infrastructure. Separately, and at lower materiality, CIPS — the renminbi cross-border interbank payment system — recorded a single-day transaction-value record of RMB1.22 trillion in April 2026, with average daily volumes up approximately 20 percent year-on-year in March, a dashboard-level signal of continued growth in renminbi cross-border settlement volume rather than a standalone regulatory development.
Outlook
Expect continued institutional participant growth on the Cross-Border e-CNY Transfer Service and continued CIPS volume growth, both consistent with a strategic Chinese push to build out renminbi-denominated cross-border settlement infrastructure. The interest-bearing reclassification of e-CNY and the asymmetric reserve requirement for non-bank payment firms are structural changes likely to persist rather than reverse.
Sources and findings (5)
- T2https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202603/03/WS69a642bea310d6866eb3b485.htmlretrieved
- T2https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-Border_Interbank_Payment_Systemretrieved
- T3https://www.fxcintel.com/research/analysis/cips-growth-may-2025retrieved
- T3https://www.forbesafrica.com/brand-voice/2025/12/16/how-africas-global-payment-infrastructure-is-entering-a-new-phaseretrieved
- T3https://www.ainvest.com/news/china-digital-yuan-strategic-shift-deposit-based-currency-implications-global-financial-sovereignty-digital-currency-investment-opportunities-2512/retrieved