#
Conduct and safeguarding of SVF licensees are governed by HKMA guidelines issued under s.54 PSSVFO. SVF licensees must maintain AML/CFT systems and meet supervisory expectations set out in the Guideline on Supervision of SVF Licensees. There is no single statutory 'safeguarding' instrument modelled on UK CASS; protection of the float is delivered through SVF minimum criteria and supervisory oversight. The MA holds pecuniary-penalty powers under s.33Q, and an appeals route exists via the PSSVF Appeals Tribunal.
This is a non-bank-focused module: SVF operators (the non-bank PI/EMI-equivalent population) must meet ongoing supervisory expectations and AML/CFT control standards, with enforcement risk arising through s.33Q penalties. The mechanism is materially distinct from the UK's May 2026 safeguarding rules — Hong Kong does not operate a single statutory safeguarding regime but instead embeds float protection in supervisory criteria.
Outlook
The conduct and float-protection framework is established and supervisory in character. The live distinction to monitor is the gap between Hong Kong's criteria-based model and statutory safeguarding regimes elsewhere; no single safeguarding statute is in prospect.
no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief
Sources and findings (3)
- T1https://www.hkma.gov.hk/eng/key-functions/international-financial-centre/stored-value-facilities-and-retail-payment-systems/regulatory-regime-for-stored-value-facilities/retrieved
- T1https://www.hkma.gov.hk/eng/key-functions/international-financial-centre/stored-value-facilities-and-retail-payment-systems/retrieved
- T1https://www.fstb.gov.hk/fsb/en/topical/pssvfat.htmlretrieved