#
Florida enacted the first comprehensive US state-level licensing framework for payment stablecoin issuers (HB 175 / companion SB 314, now Ch. 2026-176), integrated into the existing Chapter 560 money-services-business regime and aligned with the federal GENIUS Act; core provisions take effect October 1, 2026.
Outlook
No material change to Florida's conduct or recordkeeping duties was identified this cycle. The safeguarding architecture for the incoming stablecoin-issuer regime (reserve backing and CPA-verified disclosures) sits in W2 rather than here; watch for whether OFR issues conduct-specific guidance to accompany the 1 October 2026 stablecoin licensing go-live.
Conduct, Safeguarding & Financial Promotions
Florida enacted Chapter 2026-176 (House Bill 175 / Senate Bill 314) this cycle, establishing an Office of Financial Regulation-supervised licensing framework for payment stablecoin issuers under the state's existing Chapter 560 money-services-business statute, effective October 1, 2026 (wpm-2026-W1b-001). This is the first comprehensive US state-level licensing regime built specifically for payment stablecoin issuers, and it is structured as a nonbank instrument, issued and supervised within the money-services-business track rather than through a bank charter, preserving the bank-PSP versus nonbank-PI/EMI distinction that runs through Florida's broader payments regulatory architecture. The regime requires 1:1 reserve backing for outstanding stablecoin liabilities and provides a substantial-similarity certification pathway tied to the federal GENIUS Act, administered by the Office of Financial Regulation as a second, OFR-issued instrument layered on top of the base licence (wpm-2026-W1b-002). Neither the state-qualified issuer licence nor the substantial-similarity certification carries a stated exemption, meaning the licensing gate applies without a general carve-out for either instrument. Because the framework is grafted onto Chapter 560 rather than built as a freestanding regime, issuers face conduct and safeguarding obligations, including the 1:1 reserve-segregation requirement, from within an already-functioning supervisory apparatus rather than a newly constituted one.
The core date to track is October 1, 2026, when the licensing requirement and the 1:1 reserve standard become operative. Whether other US states reference Florida's Chapter-560-integrated approach as a template for their own stablecoin-issuer frameworks is the structural question for this module going into the next cycle.
Sources and findings (5 unique sources · R-3/R-4)
- [W1b-E1] T1 Derived: Confirmed in_forcehttps://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2021/Chapter560/All re-verified
<cite index="18-17,18-19">Licensees and authorised vendors must maintain all books, accounts, documents and files necessary to determine compliance for 5 years, and must make records available to OFR within 3 business days of a written request</cite>.
- [W1b-E2] T1 Derived: Confirmed in_forcehttps://law.justia.com/codes/florida/2005/TitleXXXIII/ch0560.html re-verified
<cite index="5-13,5-14">The Florida Control of Money Laundering in Money Transmitters Act requires submission of reports and maintenance of records of transactions to deter use of money transmitters to conceal criminal proceeds</cite>, underpinning ongoing conduct/AML-program obligations.
- [W1b-E3] T1 Derived: Confirmed in_forcehttps://www.myfloridalegal.com/consumer-protection re-verified
<cite index="32-4">Since 2019 the Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division, the primary FDUTPA enforcer, has secured more than $565 million in total relief, including over $426 million in direct consumer relief</cite>, applicable to deceptive commercial/payments conduct.
- [W1b-E4] T1 Derived: Confirmed in_forcehttps://pinellas.gov/recognize-and-avoid-telemarketing-fraud/ re-verified
<cite index="92-6">Non-exempt telemarketing companies must be licensed with the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and post a security bond of at least $50,000 before soliciting</cite>, a conduct control relevant to payments-adjacent marketing channels.
- [W1b-E5] T2 Derived: Confirmed in_forcehttps://www.mofo.com/resources/insights/241111-uptick-in-florida-telephone-solicitation-act-litigation re-verified
<cite index="94-4,94-5">The FTSA is Florida's 'mini-TCPA', requiring consent for auto-dialed calls/texts and giving a private right of action with damages of $500 per violation or actual damages, whichever is greater</cite>, exposing payments marketers to class-action risk.