United States — Florida (US-FL)
Lead Signal
Florida has become the first US state to enact a comprehensive payment-stablecoin issuer licensing framework, establishing a state-qualified pathway aligned to the federal GENIUS Act. The framework, created by HB175/SB314, carries a two-tier effective-date structure rather than a single date: definitional provisions, the Office of Financial Regulation's rulemaking authority, and an amendment to the state's Money Laundering Act took effect upon the bill becoming law in March 2026, while the substantive licensing and prudential requirements for qualified issuers take effect on 1 October 2026. Under the reserve regime, Florida payment stablecoins must be backed 1:1 with high-quality liquid assets — US currency, insured deposits, short-term Treasuries and government money-market funds — with issuers required to provide monthly CPA-verified reserve disclosures. The Florida Department of Financial Services operates a Stablecoin Pilot Program under s.17.72, F.S., allowing acceptance of designated stablecoins for state regulatory fee payments such as licensing applications and renewals, positioning Florida as a potential first-mover on government stablecoin acceptance under the GENIUS Act architecture. The Office of Financial Regulation's Division of Consumer Finance administers this alongside its existing non-bank money-transmission regime under Chapter 560, F.S. and Rule 69V-560, F.A.C., a regime kept separate from the Chapter 663 international-banking framework governing foreign bank offices, under which Part II money-transmitter licensees may conduct Part III activities without added fees.
Outlook
Florida's regulatory calendar over the next nine months is dominated by staged stablecoin and virtual-currency-kiosk effective dates: substantive stablecoin issuer licensing and prudential requirements become operative 1 October 2026, alongside the SB314 AML-Act extension; virtual-currency-kiosk consumer-protection provisions take effect 1 January 2027; and the kiosk operator registration requirement itself takes effect 1 March 2027. Watch for OFR rulemaking detail on qualified-issuer supervision as the October deadline approaches, for further movement in the Walmart interchange-settlement decertification dispute, and for whether Florida's Stablecoin Pilot Program for state fee payments expands ahead of the licensing regime going live. The absence of a DORA-equivalent operational-resilience regime, an APP-fraud reimbursement mandate, or a bespoke chargeback-dispute statute leaves Florida's payments conduct baseline resting on FIPA breach notification, FDUTPA enforcement and federal Reg E and card-network rules, gaps that will bear continued monitoring as the state's stablecoin and kiosk regimes come into force.
Other Developments
Alongside the stablecoin framework, Florida enacted HB505, the Virtual Currency Kiosk Act, creating a registration-only regime, not full licensing, for VC kiosk operators, with already-licensed money transmitters exempted. Effective dates are staged: consumer-protection provisions, including transaction limits, disclosures and refund rights, take effect 1 January 2027, while the operator registration requirement follows on 1 March 2027. Those protections respond to more than $33 million in FBI/FTC-reported Florida kiosk-fraud losses between January 2020 and December 2025, and will impose daily transaction limits of $2,000 for new customers and $10,000 for existing customers, plus mandatory full refunds within 72 hours for fraud losses. Chapter 560 licensing applicants remain subject to bonding requirements under s.560.209, F.S., a corporate surety bond or collateral of $50,000 to $2,000,000 depending on size and location count, with ongoing net worth of at least $100,000 and annual audited financials, against a two-year licence term and a $750 renewal fee. Conduct-side, licensees and authorised vendors must retain compliance-relevant books and records for five years and produce them to OFR within three business days of a written request under s.560.1105, F.S., while the Florida Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division has secured more than $565 million in total relief since 2019, including over $426 million in direct consumer relief, under FDUTPA — a cumulative figure that carries no as-of date on its source page and is treated here as background context pending a dated refresh.
On enforcement, the Office of Financial Regulation issued a final order on 13 March 2026 approving a consent agreement with a Delaware-based software company that had operated as an unlicensed money transmitter in Florida from January 2011 to August 2025, resulting in a $155,000 fine and a forward compliance commitment under Chapter 560. Global E-Trading LLC, doing business as Chargebacks911 and based in Florida, remains subject to a joint FTC/Florida Attorney General enforcement action, pending in federal court in Tampa, alleging use of prepaid-gift-card microtransactions to disguise merchants' true chargeback rates and evade card-network scrutiny. In scheme-compliance terms, Florida card-accepting merchants sit within the nationwide $5.54 billion Visa/Mastercard interchange-fee settlement covering January 2004 to January 2025 and affirmed by the Second Circuit in 2023, while Walmart's petition to decertify the settlement class, to allow large national merchants to pursue independent remedies against Visa and Mastercard, remained pending before Judge Cogan as of late 2025.
On market structure, Florida counted 663 licensed money services businesses operating 42,846 authorised locations and branches as of January 2025, underpinning Miami's role as the principal US gateway for Latin America and Caribbean remittance corridors, through which roughly $170 billion was remitted in 2024, 80% of it originating from the United States. Incumbent operators such as Miami-headquartered Intermex Wire Transfer, licensed across multiple US states, continue to anchor that corridor infrastructure. Félix, a Miami-based remittance fintech, runs a WhatsApp-native product requiring no app download that uses stablecoins behind the scenes to cut cost and settlement time on the US-Mexico, Guatemala and Honduras corridors, and reported its user base more than doubling from 175,000 to 400,000 and its team growing from 150 to 300 employees over the trailing twelve months to March 2026. Governor DeSantis signed the stablecoin issuer and virtual-currency-kiosk bills into law on 27 June 2026, a market-enabling regulatory event for future Florida stablecoin-issuance activity; no Florida-specific fintech or payments M&A transaction was identified within the trailing-twelve-month baseline window despite dedicated search, a gap consistent with known under-indexing of private-company deal activity.
Operational resilience remains governed by the Florida Information Protection Act, which mandates breach notification to the Department of Legal Affairs within 30 days for breaches affecting 500 or more Florida residents, among the strictest notification windows in the country, enforced by the Attorney General with penalties of up to $500,000 per incident; no DORA-equivalent dedicated resilience regime for payments firms was identified.
Cross-Monitor Connections
Two Florida payments developments carry an illicit-finance dimension that exceeds this monitor's scope and has been routed to the Financial Intelligence Monitor. A Miami-Dade-headquartered bank faces a derivative lawsuit, pending in the Southern District of Florida, over board decisions including the 2017 opening of a correspondent account for Banco de Venezuela despite competitor de-risking amid sanctions pressure, a dynamic that later drew regulatory scrutiny via a consent order. Separately, SB314 extends Bank Secrecy Act-aligned AML obligations to stablecoin issuers by adding stablecoins to the statutory definition of monetary value under the Florida Control of Money Laundering in Money Services Business Act, effective alongside the substantive stablecoin licensing provisions on 1 October 2026. The underlying AML program requirements, risk assessment, employee training, a compliance officer, and SAR filing to FinCEN upon identification of questionable transactions, are carried in this monitor via the Sentinel.gi feed rather than original illicit-finance analysis. Florida's correspondent-banking access architecture, run through Chapter 663 licensing of foreign-bank agency, branch and representative offices with capital-equivalency deposit requirements, sits alongside the Florida International Bankers Association's role as a recognised Center for Excellence for AML compliance training across the Latin America/Caribbean correspondent-banking corridor.
Legal accessibility by product
overall:Domains
14 regulatory modules · click to expand the full sub-briefLicensing, Authorisation & Market Access
ConfirmedFlorida's non-bank money-transmission regime sits under Chapter 560, F.S.
Stablecoins & Digital Money
ConfirmedPayment stablecoins issued under Florida's HB175/SB314 regime must be backed 1:1 with high-quality liquid assets, including US currency, insured deposits, short-term Treasuries, and government money-market funds, with issuers required to provide monthly CPA-verified reserve disclosures.
Conduct, Safeguarding & Promotions
ConfirmedUnder s.560.1105, F.S., licensees and authorised vendors must retain compliance-relevant books, accounts, documents and files for five years and produce records to the Office of Financial Regulation within three business days of a written request; this recordkeeping baseline is sourced to a 2021 statute snapshot and has not been independently confirmed current for the 2026 session, though no amendment has been identified.
Operational Resilience & Critical Infra
HighFlorida's operative baseline for payments-sector operational resilience is the Florida Information Protection Act (FIPA), s.501.171, F.S., which mandates breach notification to the Department of Legal Affairs within 30 days for breaches affecting 500 or more Florida residents, among the strictest notification windows in the United States, enforced by the Attorney General with penalties of up to $500,000 per incident.
Scheme & Network Compliance
AssessedFlorida card-accepting merchants sit within the nationwide Payment Card Interchange Fee Settlement, under which $5.54 billion was approved for merchants accepting Visa and Mastercard between January 2004 and January 2025, with the Second Circuit affirming the settlement in 2023.
Payment Corridor Dynamics
HighMiami functions as the principal US gateway for Latin America and Caribbean remittance corridors: approximately $170 billion was remitted to the region in 2024 via money-transfer operators, with 80% of that volume originating from the United States.
Full per-domain detail — all 14 modules
W1aConfirmedLicensing, Authorisation & Market Access
see this theme across all jurisdictions →6 claimsFlorida runs a non-bank money-transmission licensing regime under Chapter 560 (the Money Transmitters' Code), administered by the Office of Financial Regulation (OFR) Division of Consumer Finance, separate from a Chapter 663 international-banking regime for foreign bank offices. 2026 legislation adds a state-qualified payment-stablecoin issuer licensing pathway (effective Oct 1 2026) and a registration-only regime for virtual-currency kiosks (effective Jan 1 2027).
No periodic updates yet · baseline brief is current.
Read the full sub-brief
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
Florida's non-bank money-transmission regime sits under Chapter 560, F.S. and Rule 69V-560, F.A.C., administered by the Office of Financial Regulation's Division of Consumer Finance, and is kept separate from the Chapter 663 international-banking regime for foreign bank offices; Part II licensees may conduct Part III activities without added fees. Two pieces of 2026 legislation extend this architecture. HB175/SB314 creates a state-qualified payment-stablecoin issuer licensing pathway aligned to the federal GENIUS Act, with a two-tier effective-date structure: definitional provisions, OFR rulemaking authority, and the Money Laundering Act amendment took effect upon the bill becoming law in March 2026, while the substantive licensing and prudential requirements for qualified issuers take effect 1 October 2026. HB505, the Virtual Currency Kiosk Act, creates a registration-only regime, not full licensing, for VC kiosk operators, exempting already-licensed money transmitters; its effective dates are staged, with consumer-protection provisions effective 1 January 2027 and the operator registration requirement effective 1 March 2027. Across the Chapter 560 licensing base, applicants must obtain a corporate surety bond or collateral of $50,000 to $2,000,000 depending on size and location count under s.560.209, F.S., and licensees must thereafter maintain at least $100,000 net worth plus annual audited financials, with licences valid for two years against a $750 renewal fee.
Outlook
The compliance calendar through 2027 is staged rather than singular: stablecoin issuer licensing substantive requirements activate 1 October 2026, kiosk consumer protections activate 1 January 2027, and the kiosk operator registration requirement activates 1 March 2027. Firms operating across licensing categories should track each date separately rather than treat the regime as a single go-live.
Florida runs a non-bank money-transmission licensing regime under Chapter 560 (the Money Transmitters' Code), administered by the Office of Financial Regulation (OFR) Division of Consumer Finance, separate from a Chapter 663 international-banking regime for foreign bank offices. 2026 legislation adds a state-qualified payment-stablecoin issuer licensing pathway (effective Oct 1 2026) and a registration-only regime for virtual-currency kiosks (effective Jan 1 2027).
Evidence — 6 structured claims
Key facts
- Content Tier
- SB
- Sentinel Feed
- False
Event Findings
Sources
Money Transmitters [T1] HB 175 (2026) Bill Analysis [T1] STORAGE NAME: h0505z DATE: 3/25/2026 1 FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES [T1]
Florida became the first US state to enact a comprehensive payment-stablecoin issuer framework (HB175/SB314), aligned to the federal GENIUS Act and effective October 1, 2026, paired with a Stablecoin Pilot Program letting the Department of Financial Services accept designated stablecoins for state fee payments.
No periodic updates yet · baseline brief is current.
Read the full sub-brief
Stablecoins & Digital Money
Payment stablecoins issued under Florida's HB175/SB314 regime must be backed 1:1 with high-quality liquid assets, including US currency, insured deposits, short-term Treasuries, and government money-market funds, with issuers required to provide monthly CPA-verified reserve disclosures. The Florida Department of Financial Services separately operates a Stablecoin Pilot Program under s.17.72, F.S., allowing designated stablecoins to be accepted for state regulatory fee payments such as licensing applications and renewals, positioning Florida as a potential first-mover on stablecoin acceptance for government fees under the GENIUS Act framework.
Outlook
The substantive licensing and prudential requirements for qualified stablecoin issuers take effect 1 October 2026; the definitional, administrative and AML-Act provisions are already in force following enactment. Watch for OFR rulemaking to operationalise the reserve-disclosure and issuer-supervision requirements ahead of that date, and for whether the Stablecoin Pilot Program expands beyond state fee payments.
Florida became the first US state to enact a comprehensive payment-stablecoin issuer framework (HB175/SB314), aligned to the federal GENIUS Act and effective October 1, 2026, paired with a Stablecoin Pilot Program letting the Department of Financial Services accept designated stablecoins for state fee payments.
Evidence — 5 structured claims
Key facts
- Content Tier
- SB
- Sentinel Feed
- False
Event Findings
Sources
Florida senate clears stablecoin bill for DeSantis | Bitget News [T3] Florida lawmakers approve stablecoin pilot program allowing digital payments for state fees [T3]
Conduct standards sit across Chapter 560 recordkeeping/AML duties, the state's general deceptive-practices statute (FDUTPA), and dedicated telemarketing/solicitation statutes (Florida Telemarketing Act and the FTSA 'mini-TCPA') that regulate promotional conduct relevant to payments and money-services marketing.
No periodic updates yet · baseline brief is current.
Read the full sub-brief
Conduct, Safeguarding & Financial Promotions
Under s.560.1105, F.S., licensees and authorised vendors must retain compliance-relevant books, accounts, documents and files for five years and produce records to the Office of Financial Regulation within three business days of a written request; this recordkeeping baseline is sourced to a 2021 statute snapshot and has not been independently confirmed current for the 2026 session, though no amendment has been identified. Separately, the Florida Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division, which enforces the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act against deceptive payments and commercial conduct, has secured more than $565 million in total relief since 2019, including over $426 million in direct consumer relief; this cumulative figure carries no as-of date on its source page, so its currency for the current cycle cannot be confirmed and it is treated as background context pending a dated refresh.
Outlook
No material change to Florida's conduct or recordkeeping duties was identified this cycle. The safeguarding architecture for the incoming stablecoin-issuer regime (reserve backing and CPA-verified disclosures) sits in W2 rather than here; watch for whether OFR issues conduct-specific guidance to accompany the 1 October 2026 stablecoin licensing go-live.
Conduct standards sit across Chapter 560 recordkeeping/AML duties, the state's general deceptive-practices statute (FDUTPA), and dedicated telemarketing/solicitation statutes (Florida Telemarketing Act and the FTSA 'mini-TCPA') that regulate promotional conduct relevant to payments and money-services marketing.
Evidence — 5 structured claims
Key facts
- Content Tier
- SB
- Sentinel Feed
- False
Event Findings
Sources
Chapter 560 - 2021 Florida Statutes - The Florida Senate [T1] Consumer Protection Division | My Florida Legal [T3]
Florida has no DORA-style prudential operational-resilience regime specific to payments; the operative baseline protection is the Florida Information Protection Act (FIPA), a strict 30-day breach-notification law enforced by the Attorney General, supplemented by periodic OFR cybersecurity industry alerts to licensees.
No periodic updates yet · baseline brief is current.
Read the full sub-brief
Operational Resilience & Critical Infrastructure
Florida's operative baseline for payments-sector operational resilience is the Florida Information Protection Act (FIPA), s.501.171, F.S., which mandates breach notification to the Department of Legal Affairs within 30 days for breaches affecting 500 or more Florida residents, among the strictest notification windows in the United States, enforced by the Attorney General with penalties of up to $500,000 per incident. No dedicated DORA-equivalent prudential operational-resilience or critical-third-party-outsourcing regime for payments firms or MSBs was identified in Florida beyond FIPA and periodic OFR cybersecurity industry alerts.
Outlook
No material change to Florida's operational-resilience baseline was identified this cycle; FIPA's 30-day breach-notification standard remains the reference point absent a dedicated payments-resilience regime. Continued absence of a DORA-equivalent framework should be monitored as stablecoin issuance brings new technology-dependent infrastructure into scope from October 2026.
Florida has no DORA-style prudential operational-resilience regime specific to payments; the operative baseline protection is the Florida Information Protection Act (FIPA), a strict 30-day breach-notification law enforced by the Attorney General, supplemented by periodic OFR cybersecurity industry alerts to licensees.
Evidence — 4 structured claims
Key facts
- Content Tier
- SB
- Sentinel Feed
- False
Event Findings
Sources
Chapter 501 Section 171 - 2014 Florida Statutes - The Florida Senate [T1]
Florida merchants are subject to the nationwide Visa/Mastercard interchange-fee antitrust settlement framework and to PCI DSS as the scheme-mandated technical standard; a Florida-based payments company (Chargebacks911) has been the subject of a joint FTC/Florida Attorney General enforcement action over scheme-facing chargeback-manipulation conduct.
No periodic updates yet · baseline brief is current.
Read the full sub-brief
Scheme & Network Compliance
Florida card-accepting merchants sit within the nationwide Payment Card Interchange Fee Settlement, under which $5.54 billion was approved for merchants accepting Visa and Mastercard between January 2004 and January 2025, with the Second Circuit affirming the settlement in 2023. That settlement structure faces a live challenge: Walmart petitioned to decertify the plaintiff class so that large national merchants could pursue independent remedies against Visa and Mastercard, a petition pending before Judge Cogan as of late 2025.
Outlook
The Walmart decertification petition is the primary scheme-compliance dynamic to watch; a ruling permitting large merchants to exit the settlement class would reshape interchange-litigation exposure for card networks nationally, with direct relevance to Florida's card-accepting merchant base.
Florida merchants are subject to the nationwide Visa/Mastercard interchange-fee antitrust settlement framework and to PCI DSS as the scheme-mandated technical standard; a Florida-based payments company (Chargebacks911) has been the subject of a joint FTC/Florida Attorney General enforcement action over scheme-facing chargeback-manipulation conduct.
Evidence — 3 structured claims
Key facts
- Content Tier
- SB
- Sentinel Feed
- False
Event Findings
Sources
Payment card interchange fee and merchant discount antitrust litigation - Wikipedia [T3] Walmart wants out of card class | Payments Dive [T3]
Florida, and Miami specifically, functions as the principal US gateway for remittance corridors to Latin America and the Caribbean, hosting major money-transfer operators and a growing cluster of digital-first remittance fintechs serving these corridors.
No periodic updates yet · baseline brief is current.
Read the full sub-brief
Payment Corridor Dynamics
Miami functions as the principal US gateway for Latin America and Caribbean remittance corridors: approximately $170 billion was remitted to the region in 2024 via money-transfer operators, with 80% of that volume originating from the United States. Incumbent corridor infrastructure is anchored by operators such as Intermex Wire Transfer, headquartered in Miami and holding money-transmitter licences across multiple US states.
Outlook
The US-LAC corridor remains a sustained high-volume commercial artery for Florida-based payments firms. Watch for continued share migration toward stablecoin-enabled digital challengers (tracked in W9) alongside the incumbent MTO base, and for any corridor-level effect from the Florida stablecoin-issuer regime once substantive licensing takes effect in October 2026.
Florida, and Miami specifically, functions as the principal US gateway for remittance corridors to Latin America and the Caribbean, hosting major money-transfer operators and a growing cluster of digital-first remittance fintechs serving these corridors.
Evidence — 5 structured claims
Key facts
- Content Tier
- SB
- Sentinel Feed
- False
Event Findings
Sources
The State of the Remittance Industry and an Outlook for 2025 – Inter-American Dialogue [T3] Intermex, Send Money to Latin America. Safe, secure and easy [T3]
Florida's payments/fintech industry is structured around a Miami-centred hub of private, often venture-backed remittance and crypto-payments firms operating alongside a base of 663 OFR-licensed money-services businesses, with large listed money-transfer operators and card networks also present.
No periodic updates yet · baseline brief is current.
Read the full sub-brief
Industry Structure & Commercial Dynamics
Florida's non-bank payments industry is substantial in scale: the Office of Financial Regulation licensed 663 money services businesses operating 42,846 authorised locations and branches as of January 2025. This licensed base underpins the corridor and remittance activity tracked elsewhere in this brief and provides the structural backdrop against which the new stablecoin-issuer and VC-kiosk regimes will be layered.
Outlook
No material change to Florida's MSB market-structure count was identified this cycle beyond the January 2025 baseline figure. Watch for whether the stablecoin-issuer licensing pathway, once substantive requirements take effect in October 2026, expands the licensed population beyond the existing 663-MSB base.
Florida's payments/fintech industry is structured around a Miami-centred hub of private, often venture-backed remittance and crypto-payments firms operating alongside a base of 663 OFR-licensed money-services businesses, with large listed money-transfer operators and card networks also present.
Evidence — 4 structured claims
Key facts
- Content Tier
- SB
- Sentinel Feed
- False
Event Findings
Sources
src-09e73f1ae82f
Florida payments litigation and enforcement activity spans OFR administrative fines for unlicensed money transmission, a landmark OFR declaratory ruling narrowing federal-exemption arguments, Edge Act correspondent-banking litigation touching a Miami-based bank, and a joint FTC/Florida AG case against a Florida-based chargeback-management firm.
No periodic updates yet · baseline brief is current.
Read the full sub-brief
Legal & Litigation
The Office of Financial Regulation issued a final order on 13 March 2026 approving a consent agreement with a Delaware-based software company found to have operated as an unlicensed money transmitter in Florida from January 2011 to August 2025; the company agreed to pay a $155,000 fine and to comply with Chapter 560 going forward, an enforcement precedent illustrating OFR's active posture against unlicensed money transmission. Separately, a Miami-Dade-headquartered bank faces a derivative lawsuit, pending in the Southern District of Florida, concerning board decisions on correspondent banking, including the 2017 opening of a correspondent account for Banco de Venezuela despite competitor de-risking amid sanctions pressure.
Outlook
Watch for the outcome of the Edge Act derivative suit in the Southern District of Florida, and for whether the OFR consent-order fine level informs future unlicensed-transmission enforcement benchmarks. The sanctions dimension of the correspondent-banking litigation has been flagged to the Financial Intelligence Monitor rather than analysed here.
Florida payments litigation and enforcement activity spans OFR administrative fines for unlicensed money transmission, a landmark OFR declaratory ruling narrowing federal-exemption arguments, Edge Act correspondent-banking litigation touching a Miami-based bank, and a joint FTC/Florida AG case against a Florida-based chargeback-management firm.
Evidence — 5 structured claims
Key facts
- Content Tier
- SB
- Sentinel Feed
- False
Event Findings
Sources
Florida fines software company $155K for alleged unlicensed money transmission [T3] 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA [T1]
Florida has no bespoke statutory chargeback-dispute regime; merchant-acquiring risk controls flow from card-network rules plus general consumer/telemarketing statutes, with a high-profile Florida-based chargeback-management firm the subject of federal/state enforcement over chargeback-manipulation tactics affecting high-risk-merchant risk management.
No periodic updates yet · baseline brief is current.
Read the full sub-brief
Merchant Acquiring & Risk
Global E-Trading LLC, doing business as Chargebacks911 and based in Florida, is subject to a joint FTC/Florida Attorney General enforcement action, pending in federal court in Tampa, alleging use of prepaid-gift-card microtransactions to falsely reduce merchants' chargeback rates and evade bank and card-company scrutiny. Florida has no bespoke statutory chargeback-dispute regime distinct from card-network rules and federal Regulation E, leaving scheme rules and this kind of case-by-case enforcement as the operative merchant-acquiring-risk framework.
Outlook
The Chargebacks911 case remains the key merchant-acquiring-risk enforcement signal to track; its outcome may clarify regulatory tolerance for chargeback-rate-management practices that intersect with card-scheme compliance obligations tracked in W4.
Florida has no bespoke statutory chargeback-dispute regime; merchant-acquiring risk controls flow from card-network rules plus general consumer/telemarketing statutes, with a high-profile Florida-based chargeback-management firm the subject of federal/state enforcement over chargeback-manipulation tactics affecting high-risk-merchant risk management.
Evidence — 3 structured claims
Key facts
- Content Tier
- SB
- Sentinel Feed
- False
Event Findings
Sources
The 411 about FTC-Florida AG action against Chargebacks911 | Federal Trade Commission [T1]
Florida combines sustained state-level fintech-innovation institutions (Blockchain Task Force, OFR Office of Fintech Policy) with 2026 product-enabling legislation for stablecoin issuance and government use, and an active private-sector product pipeline in cross-border/remittance fintech centred on Miami.
No periodic updates yet · baseline brief is current.
Read the full sub-brief
Product Innovation & Market Development
Félix, a Miami-based remittance fintech, operates a WhatsApp-native remittance product requiring no app download, using stablecoins behind the scenes to improve cost and speed on the US-Mexico, Guatemala and Honduras corridors. Its emergence sits alongside the state's own Stablecoin Pilot Program for government fee payments, illustrating parallel public- and private-sector stablecoin product innovation emerging from Florida.
Outlook
Watch for continued scaling of stablecoin-enabled remittance products such as Félix's as the state's stablecoin-issuer licensing regime comes into substantive force in October 2026, and for whether incumbent MTOs respond with their own stablecoin-rail integrations.
Florida combines sustained state-level fintech-innovation institutions (Blockchain Task Force, OFR Office of Fintech Policy) with 2026 product-enabling legislation for stablecoin issuance and government use, and an active private-sector product pipeline in cross-border/remittance fintech centred on Miami.
Evidence — 4 structured claims
Key facts
- Content Tier
- SB
- Sentinel Feed
- False
Event Findings
Sources
Félix is turning WhatsApp into a remittance engine for 400,000+ immigrants - Refresh Miami [T3]
Florida consumer protection for payments rests on the general FDUTPA/FTSA private-enforcement framework plus newly enacted virtual-currency-kiosk-specific fraud protections (transaction limits, mandatory warnings, conditional refunds); Florida has not enacted a dedicated authorized-push-payment reimbursement mandate comparable to the UK's PSR regime.
No periodic updates yet · baseline brief is current.
Read the full sub-brief
Consumer Protection & APP Fraud
HB505 introduces new consumer-fraud protections for virtual-currency kiosks: daily transaction limits of $2,000 for new customers and $10,000 for existing customers, and mandatory full refunds within 72 hours for fraud losses, responding to more than $33 million in FBI/FTC-reported Florida kiosk-fraud losses between January 2020 and December 2025. These protections have staged effective dates: the consumer-protection provisions take effect 1 January 2027, distinct from the 1 March 2027 operator-registration requirement. Florida has not enacted a dedicated authorised-push-payment fraud mandatory-reimbursement regime comparable to the UK's Payment Systems Regulator model.
Outlook
The kiosk consumer-protection provisions take effect 1 January 2027; watch for OFR guidance on implementation ahead of that date and for whether kiosk-fraud loss figures continue to climb before the protections activate.
Florida consumer protection for payments rests on the general FDUTPA/FTSA private-enforcement framework plus newly enacted virtual-currency-kiosk-specific fraud protections (transaction limits, mandatory warnings, conditional refunds); Florida has not enacted a dedicated authorized-push-payment reimbursement mandate comparable to the UK's PSR regime.
Evidence — 4 structured claims
Key facts
- Content Tier
- SB
- Sentinel Feed
- False
Event Findings
Sources
STORAGE NAME: h0505z DATE: 3/25/2026 1 FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES [T1]
W11ConfirmedAML/CFT & Financial Crime (Sentinel.gi-fed)
Sentinelsee this theme across all jurisdictions →9 claimssentinel.wpm-us-fl: Florida's AML/CFT posture for payments rests on the Chapter 560 Control of Money Laundering in Money Services Businesses Act (BSA-aligned recordkeeping and SAR obligations), newly extended to stablecoin issuers, plus a blockchain-analytics mandate for virtual-currency kiosks and a persistent Miami correspondent-banking de-risking/sanctions-exposure dynamic tracked via the FIBA compliance community.
No periodic updates yet · baseline brief is current.
Read the full sub-brief
AML/CFT & Financial Crime
This module's intelligence is sourced from the Sentinel.gi feed; WPM carries the finding forward without independent illicit-finance analysis. The Florida Control of Money Laundering in Money Services Business Act requires AML programs, comprising risk assessment, employee training and a compliance officer, for MSB licensees, with SAR filing to FinCEN upon identification of questionable transactions. SB314 extends these Bank Secrecy Act-aligned obligations to stablecoin issuers by adding stablecoins to the statutory definition of monetary value, effective alongside the substantive stablecoin licensing provisions on 1 October 2026. Separately, a Miami-based bank's 2017 opening of a correspondent account for Banco de Venezuela, despite competitor de-risking amid sanctions pressure, later drew regulatory scrutiny via a consent order; the sanctions-evasion dimension of this dynamic has been routed to the Financial Intelligence Monitor as exceeding WPM's payments-instrument scope.
Outlook
The SB314 AML extension to stablecoin issuers takes effect alongside substantive licensing on 1 October 2026. For further analysis of the correspondent-banking sanctions dimension, see the Financial Intelligence Monitor; this module will continue to carry Sentinel.gi-fed findings rather than original illicit-finance conclusions.
sentinel.wpm-us-fl: Florida's AML/CFT posture for payments rests on the Chapter 560 Control of Money Laundering in Money Services Businesses Act (BSA-aligned recordkeeping and SAR obligations), newly extended to stablecoin issuers, plus a blockchain-analytics mandate for virtual-currency kiosks and a persistent Miami correspondent-banking de-risking/sanctions-exposure dynamic tracked via the FIBA compliance community.
Evidence — 9 structured claims
Key facts
- Content Tier
- SB
- Sentinel Feed
- True
Event Findings
Sources
Florida Becomes First U.S. State To Pass a Stablecoin Regulatory Bill | CoinMarketCap [T3]
W12ConfirmedCorrespondent Banking, Settlement & Access
see this theme across all jurisdictions →5 claimsFlorida's correspondent-banking and cross-border settlement access architecture runs through Chapter 663 (International Banking), which lets OFR licence foreign-bank agencies/branches/offices, with Miami serving as a de facto US correspondent-banking hub for Latin America, subject to sanctions-driven de-risking pressure.
No periodic updates yet · baseline brief is current.
Read the full sub-brief
Correspondent Banking, Settlement & Access
The module's analytical spine is the asymmetry between bank and non-bank access to correspondent infrastructure. Chapter 663, Florida Statutes, authorises Office of Financial Regulation licensing of foreign-bank agency, branch and representative offices in Florida, with capital-equivalency deposits required in Florida or national banks or a Federal Reserve Bank; this is a bank-only access architecture distinct from the non-bank Chapter 560 licensing regime tracked in W1a. The Florida International Bankers Association and the wider Miami correspondent-banking cluster serve as a de facto US correspondent-banking hub for Latin America and a recognised Center for Excellence for AML compliance training across the LatAm/Caribbean correspondent-banking corridor.
Outlook
No material change to Florida's Chapter 663 access architecture was identified this cycle. The sanctions-driven de-risking dynamic around Miami correspondent banking (see W7/W11) bears continued monitoring for its effect on bank-mediated access alongside the non-bank corridor infrastructure tracked in W5.
Florida's correspondent-banking and cross-border settlement access architecture runs through Chapter 663 (International Banking), which lets OFR licence foreign-bank agencies/branches/offices, with Miami serving as a de facto US correspondent-banking hub for Latin America, subject to sanctions-driven de-risking pressure.
Evidence — 5 structured claims
Key facts
- Content Tier
- SB
- Sentinel Feed
- False
Event Findings
Sources
Florida Statutes Title XXXVIII. Banks and Banking § 663.01 | FindLaw [T3] Florida International Bankers Association [T3]
W13AssessedCommercial Intelligence (M&A, Investment & Product)
see this theme across all jurisdictions →3 claimsWithin the trailing-12-month baseline window, Florida payments/fintech commercial activity is dominated by regulatory-product events (the stablecoin and virtual-currency-kiosk frameworks) and organic growth at Miami-based remittance fintechs, plus an OFR enforcement settlement; no Florida-specific fintech M&A transaction meeting the window was identified despite dedicated search.
No periodic updates yet · baseline brief is current.
Read the full sub-brief
Commercial Intelligence (M&A, Investment & Product)
No Florida-specific fintech or payments M&A transaction was identified within the trailing-twelve-month baseline window despite dedicated search, a gap consistent with WPM's known under-indexing of private-company deal activity relative to Miami's dense private fintech cluster. Available commercial signal was organic rather than transactional: Félix, the Miami-based remittance fintech, reported its team doubling from 150 to 300 employees and its user base more than doubling from 175,000 to 400,000 over the trailing twelve months to March 2026, though this growth data does not fit the closed commercial-event enum (M&A, investment, product release, partnership restructuring) and is carried here as contextual background rather than a discrete event. Governor DeSantis and the Florida Legislature signed the stablecoin-issuer and virtual-currency-kiosk bills into law on 27 June 2026, a market-enabling regulatory event for future Florida stablecoin-issuance products, though a legislative signing likewise does not constitute a discrete commercial event under the closed enum.
Outlook
Watch for whether Florida's now-enacted stablecoin framework catalyses a discrete, disclosable M&A or investment transaction once substantive licensing takes effect in October 2026; the current absence of qualifying deal activity is treated as a research gap rather than a null market.
Within the trailing-12-month baseline window, Florida payments/fintech commercial activity is dominated by regulatory-product events (the stablecoin and virtual-currency-kiosk frameworks) and organic growth at Miami-based remittance fintechs, plus an OFR enforcement settlement; no Florida-specific fintech M&A transaction meeting the window was identified despite dedicated search.
Evidence — 3 structured claims
Key facts
- Content Tier
- D
- Sentinel Feed
- False
Event Findings
Sources
Félix is turning WhatsApp into a remittance engine for 400,000+ immigrants - Refresh Miami [T3] Stablecoin, virtual currency kiosk bills signed into law [T3]