#
Comoros' Central Bank (BCC) remains the sole body empowered to authorise financial institutions nationally; the Comorian government has escalated to UK law-enforcement/financial-intelligence cooperation and prepared domestic legal action against the unrecognised Anjouan-branded licensing network.
Outlook
The Axian IFDD licence is a template other pan-African fintech and telecom groups may seek to replicate, extending BCC's willingness to license fully-digital non-bank entrants beyond incumbent mobile-money operators. Whether the AOFA/MISA dispute moves from public repudiation toward formal enforcement remains an open watch item.
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
The Comoros government has escalated its dispute over market access and authorisation legitimacy concerning the Anjouan-branded offshore licensing network, moving from unilateral public disclaimers to a formal request for United Kingdom law-enforcement and financial-intelligence cooperation, alongside stated preparation of domestic legal action. The Banque Centrale des Comores maintains its established position that only it may authorise financial institutions nationally, and that the Anjouan network's authorisations carry no legal standing under that framework. This marks a material shift in posture: rather than confining itself to statements that the network lacks legal foundation, the government is now actively pursuing cross-border cooperation to investigate and potentially act against it.
Adjacent to the gambling-licensing dispute sits a separate forex and contract-for-difference licensing body, the Anjouan Offshore Finance Authority, which issues broker certificates distinct from but related to the gambling licences under scrutiny. The Central Bank's position extends equally to these certificates: only the Banque Centrale des Comores may authorise financial institutions nationwide, and AOFA certificates are not recognised as financial licences regardless of how they are marketed. For any payment service provider or financial institution assessing market-access risk connected to entities claiming authorisation via either the gambling-licensing network or the AOFA forex route, the operative baseline is that neither confers recognised authorisation under Comoros law.
Outlook
The trajectory to watch is the outcome of the Comoros government's cooperation request to the United Kingdom and whatever domestic legal action follows. Either development could clarify, or further undermine, the legal status of both the gambling-licensing network and its adjacent AOFA forex-licensing arm, with direct consequences for any entity relying on either as a basis for claimed authorisation.
Sources and findings (6)
- T1https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/812791592801563444/pdf/Comoros-Payments-and-Settlement-Systems-Oversight-Policy-Framework.pdf Applies beyond this jurisdiction (World Bank)retrieved
- T1https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/812791592801563444/pdf/Comoros-Payments-and-Settlement-Systems-Oversight-Policy-Framework.pdf Applies beyond this jurisdiction (World Bank)retrieved
- T1https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/82217.pdfretrieved
- T2https://www.ecofinagency.com/news-digital/2702-53320-pan-african-group-axian-to-launch-100-digital-financial-entity-in-comorosretrieved
- T2https://legasset.com/anjouan-forex-licence-explained/retrieved
- T2https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/is-the-end-of-the-comoros-license-mirage-coming/retrieved