#
Texas regulates money transmission — including stablecoin issuance — under Texas Finance Code Chapter 152 (the Money Services Modernization Act of 2023), administered by the Texas Department of Banking. Texas takes a crypto-receptive posture: ordinary cryptocurrency exchange is generally not money transmission, but fiat-backed, redeemable stablecoin activity is licensable MSB activity. DOB has confirmed continued licensing consistent with the GENIUS Act.
Outlook
The dual Chapter 152/160 licensing perimeter remains stable this cycle, with no signalled amendments; the near-term watch item is whether escalating AML enforcement (tracked separately under W11) prompts supervisory tightening of the licensing or net-worth thresholds themselves.
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
Texas's money-transmitter licensing regime for non-bank payment institutions and e-money institutions saw material activity this cycle on two fronts. First, the Texas Department of Banking issued an enforcement order finding that INX had violated Finance Code Chapter 152 by consummating a change of control without the required regulatory approval. This is a confirmed-confidence finding drawn from a Tier-1 primary source, and it falls squarely within the bank-PSP versus non-bank-PI/EMI distinction that structures this module: INX is regulated under the state's money-transmitter licensing track for non-depository entities, not under bank charter supervision, and the enforcement action concerns the licensing-control obligations specific to that track — namely, that a change of control at a licensed money transmitter requires prior regulatory approval, and that consummating such a change without it is itself a violation independent of any downstream conduct issue.
Second, and read as the standing-architecture counterpart to that enforcement action, the Department publicly confirmed it will continue to license and regulate issuers of fiat-currency-backed stablecoin as money transmitters, and that it intends to do so in a manner consistent with the federal GENIUS Act. This is not a new licensing category but a reaffirmation of an existing posture, delivered with particular salience given the approaching federal rulemaking deadline. It confirms that stablecoin issuance in Texas continues to be routed through the non-bank money-transmitter licensing perimeter rather than through any separate or bank-only channel.
Underpinning both developments is Supervisory Memorandum 1037, the Department's standing interpretive guidance on which virtual-currency business models trigger money-transmission licensing obligations. The Memorandum draws a specific line: centralized virtual-currency exchange activity involving a third-party escrow-like intermediary, and the exchange of sovereign currency for virtual currency, falls inside the licensing perimeter; a stablecoin carrying a redemption right allowing the holder to redeem the coin similarly implicates money-transmission licensing. This interpretive guidance was not amended this cycle but remains the operative framework against which both the INX action and the state's stablecoin posture should be read — it is the mechanism that determines, in the first instance, which digital-asset business models Texas treats as subject to non-bank money-transmitter licensing and authorisation at all.
Taken together, this cycle's W1a picture for Texas is one of a licensing regime that is both substantively stable in its interpretive foundations and actively enforced at the margin — the Department is willing to take enforcement action against a licensed non-bank digital-asset money transmitter for a governance/control-approval failure, while simultaneously signalling continuity of the underlying licensing category into the federal GENIUS Act era.
Outlook
The operative date to track is July 18, 2026, the federal deadline by which permitted payment stablecoin issuers must have AML/sanctions-compliance programs in place; Texas's confirmed alignment posture suggests state licensing practice will track that federal timeline rather than require separate reconciliation. The INX matter warrants continued tracking given this cycle's finding rests on a single Tier-1 source describing the order itself, and its ultimate disposition — including any further licensing consequence — remains open. No changes to Supervisory Memorandum 1037's interpretive lines were identified this cycle.
1 earlier distinct update(s)
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
The Texas Department of Banking has confirmed that it continues to supervise fiat-backed stablecoin issuers through money-services-business licensing under Chapter 152 of the Finance Code, a posture it describes as consistent with the federal GENIUS Act now rolling out. This is a direct, Tier-1 regulatory statement rather than a market inference, and it establishes continuity in Texas's licensing architecture at a moment when many states' stablecoin regimes are being tested against the new federal framework.
Texas's entry-capital threshold for this licence, roughly USD 100,000 to USD 300,000 in net worth plus a surety bond, is materially lower than the USD 5 million capital floor associated with a Wyoming special-purpose depository institution charter, one of the more capital-intensive state alternatives available to stablecoin issuers. That comparative gap positions Texas as a lower-barrier state pathway under the GENIUS Act's sub-USD-10-billion state-supervision track, a structural fact that bears directly on where issuers domicile for state-level licensing purposes.
Layered on top of the state licensing framework is a federal-plus-state rulemaking mandate: implementing rules under the GENIUS Act are due no later than 18 July 2026, a deadline that binds both state regulators, including the Texas Department of Banking, and federal rulemakers simultaneously.
Outlook
Watch the 18 July 2026 GENIUS Act implementing-rules deadline and the Texas Department of Banking's continued public guidance on Chapter 152 as the near-term indicators of whether Texas's licensing architecture remains the operative supervisory framework for stablecoin issuers domiciled in the state.
Sources and findings (5)
- T1https://www.dob.texas.gov/applications-forms-publications/notice-applicants
- T1https://www.dob.texas.gov/applications-forms-publications/general-application-requirements
- T3https://legalclarity.org/texas-money-transmitter-license-who-needs-it-and-how-to-apply/
- T1https://law.justia.com/codes/texas/finance-code/title-3/subtitle-e/chapter-160/section-160-001/
- T1https://www.ssb.texas.gov/cryptocurrency-enforcement