US-NH · run world-payments-2026-07-05 v13.3.0
content: ai_generated 130 sources retrieved model claude-sonnet-5 ·

United States – New Hampshire

US-NH schema world-payments-v1 trajectory: not recorded

Last updated · 14 modules · 59 sourced findings · 130 sources in the cumulative register

14Modulesbaseline.modules[]
59Findingsmodules[].findings[]
41Tier-1 sourcesrun_metadata.t1_source_count
Confidence mix (sums to 14 rendered modules; click to filter)

Jurisdiction brief

Lead Signal

New Hampshire's first full-spectrum baseline under the World Payments Monitor reveals a jurisdiction of contradictions: a modernized, actively-enforced money-transmission licensing regime sits alongside a genuinely unresolved crypto-legislative status. RSA 399-G governs money transmission in NH, administered by the Banking Department (Bank Commissioner) via NMLS, with licensees examined at least every 24 months; HB 1241, signed Aug 23 2024 and effective Oct 22 2024, reenacted the chapter, modernizing control-acquisition, key-individual, and multistate-licensing provisions. That modernization has not translated into laxity: a February 2026 NH Banking Department consent order found RAM Payment, LLC provided third-party account-management and payment-processing services for debt-resolution consumers in NH prior to obtaining its money-transmitter license, violating RSA 399-G:2, I, while a December 2025 consent order against River Financial Inc., an Ohio-based Bitcoin ATM operator, confirms that Bitcoin-cash exchange activity crossing into fiat requires an NH money-transmitter license notwithstanding the crypto-only carve-out.

14 of 14 modules
Signal
Density

Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.

#

New Hampshire regulates money transmission under RSA 399-G, administered by the NH Banking Department via NMLS, with a licensing regime reenacted by HB 1241 (effective Oct. 22, 2024). Bank-chartered institutions are exempt; non-bank money transmitters, including virtual-currency-fiat exchangers, require a state MTL.

Movement — CHANGEDRSA 399-G:39 transition shield expired; full compliance now mandatory.Statutory transition period ended 1/1/2026.
Standing sub-brief276 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-05

Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access

New Hampshire regulates money transmission under RSA 399-G, administered by the state Banking Department (Bank Commissioner) through the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System (NMLS). Licensees are examined at least every 24 months. HB 1241, signed August 23, 2024 and effective October 22, 2024, reenacted the chapter, modernizing provisions governing control acquisitions, key-individual requirements, and multistate licensing -- a wholesale refresh of a licensing framework that predates the current wave of nonbank payments activity.

Periodic update · new data 2026-09-08 · run wpm-2026-09-05

Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access

New Hampshire's money-transmitter licensing perimeter moved in two directions simultaneously this cycle, both changes anchored to RSA 399-G. First, the transition-period shield under RSA 399-G:39, which had allowed previously-licensed money transmitters to continue operating under prior compliance terms during a grace period, expired January 1, 2026. Licensees must now demonstrate full compliance with the current text of RSA 399-G without that grace period, a tightening of the conventional money-transmission licensing environment that applies across the state's existing licensee population.

Second, and in the opposite direction, HB639, enacted as Chapter 286 of the 2026 session with main provisions effective September 8, 2026, exempts home and business digital-asset mining, node operation, and staking from RSA 399-G money-transmitter licensing entirely. This is confirmed by a Tier-1 legislative record establishing the enactment and effective date. The carve-out narrows the population of activities requiring a money-transmitter license precisely as the compliance bar for the remaining licensed population rises, producing a bifurcated regulatory posture within a single statute: tightening for conventional non-bank payment institutions and electronic-money issuers, liberalising for blockchain infrastructure participants.

Supervisory practice around the licensed population continues under an established cadence: the New Hampshire Banking Department requires money-transmitter licensees to be examined at least every 24 months, a standing baseline confirmed directly by the regulator and unaffected by either this cycle's tightening or liberalising development. The distinction between bank and non-bank market access is material here, since RSA 399-G's licensing perimeter applies to non-bank payment institutions and electronic-money issuers rather than to bank-chartered entities, which access the payments system through separate prudential channels untouched by this cycle's developments.

Outlook

The key event to watch is HB639's September 8, 2026 commencement, at which point the crypto carve-out becomes fully operative alongside the already-tightened conventional-licensee compliance requirement. Whether the New Hampshire Banking Department issues supervisory guidance clarifying the boundary between exempt crypto-infrastructure activity and activity still requiring licensure, particularly for hybrid business models combining node operation with other money-transmission functions, would be the clearest indicator of how administrable the bifurcated regime proves in practice.

Sources and findings (7)
  1. T1https://www.banking.nh.gov/consumer-credit-licensees-registrants/money-transmittersretrieved
  2. T1https://www.banking.nh.gov/news-and-media/new-hampshire-banking-department-announcement-regarding-hb-1241-relating-moneyretrieved
  3. T1https://gc.nh.gov/rsa/html/xxxvi/399-g/399-g-mrg.htmretrieved
  4. T1https://gc.nh.gov/rsa/html/xxxvi/399-g/399-g-mrg.htmretrieved
  5. T2https://legiscan.com/NH/text/HB1241/id/2868262retrieved
  6. T3https://moneytransmitterlaw.com/cryptocurrency-state-laws/new-hampshire/retrieved
  7. T1https://www.banking.nh.gov/about-usretrieved

#

Safeguarding under RSA 399-G rests on prudential net-worth and permissible-investment requirements plus the surety bond, with recordkeeping/complaint-handling obligations; the Banking Department retains cease-and-desist, consent-order and revocation powers.

Standing sub-brief200 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Conduct, Safeguarding & Financial Promotions

New Hampshire's prudential and safeguarding regime for money transmitters rests on three linked statutory pillars: net-worth maintenance (RSA 399-G:26), the surety bond (RSA 399-G:27), and permissible-investment maintenance (RSA 399-G:28-29), which together back outstanding transmission obligations. This combined net-worth-plus-bond-plus-permissible-investment structure is the core safeguarding mechanism for the jurisdiction and applies specifically to nonbank money-transmitter licensees rather than bank-chartered institutions, which are exempt from the licensing regime entirely (see W1a).

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T1https://law.justia.com/codes/new-hampshire/title-xxxvi/chapter-399-g/retrieved
  2. T1https://law.justia.com/codes/new-hampshire/title-xxxvi/chapter-399-g/retrieved
  3. T1https://www.banking.nh.gov/sites/g/files/ehbemt621/files/inline-documents/sonh/chapter-399-g_effectiveuntil2024october21.pdfretrieved
  4. T1https://www.banking.nh.gov/about-usretrieved

#

New Hampshire has no bespoke stablecoin statute; convertible-virtual-currency activity is exempt from money-transmitter licensure under RSA 399-G:3 (2017, reenacted 2024) but subject to RSA 358-A consumer protection. HB 639 ('Blockchain Basic Law'), which would codify additional protections for self-custody/node/mining/crypto-payments, has NOT been confirmed enacted: trade press describes July 2026 enrollment/registration, but legislative tracking shows a January 2026 Senate referral to interim study. Treat HB639 as pending, not current law, pending further verification.

Open gap — wpm-int-4Reliance on third-party legislative trackers (LegiScan, NH Liberty Alliance) and trade press for HB639 procedural history, rather than the NH General Court's own record, is an under-indexed primary-source gap for US state-level legislative tracking generally.US state-level legislative-tracking primary sources (official gencourt.state.nh.us floor records) were not directly retrieved this cycle; third-party trackers carry residual risk of stale or conflicting status reporting, as demonstrated by the HB639 discrepancy.
Horizon · 2026-Q3 (±multi_year)HB 639 'Blockchain Basic Law' — enactment status unresolved (Senate interim-study referral vs. reported enrollment)proposed · TT3
Standing sub-brief323 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Stablecoins & Digital Money

New Hampshire has no bespoke stablecoin statute. Instead, since 2017 (and reenacted within the October 2024 HB1241 restructuring of RSA 399-G), the state has exempted persons selling or issuing payment instruments or stored value solely in convertible virtual currency, or receiving convertible virtual currency for transmission, from money-transmitter licensure under RSA 399-G:3, VII -- while leaving such persons subject to the state's general consumer-protection statute, RSA 358-A.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T2https://www.cryptotimes.io/2026/07/04/new-hampshire-registers-hb639-blockchain-rights-crypto-protections/retrieved
  2. T3https://cryptobriefing.com/new-hampshire-hb639-crypto-payments-wallets/retrieved
  3. T3https://bills.nhliberty.org/bills/2025/HB639retrieved
  4. T3https://stevenscenter.wharton.upenn.edu/publications-50-state-review/retrieved
  5. T1https://www.banking.nh.gov/sites/g/files/ehbemt621/files/enforcement-orders/2025.12.09-river-financial-consent-order-2024-22674_signed_redacted.pdfretrieved

#

NH layers state breach-notification (RSA 359-C) and insurance-sector cybersecurity reporting (RSA 420-P) atop federal operational-resilience expectations; third-party vendor risk materialised via the 2025 Marquis Software Solutions ransomware incident.

Standing sub-brief173 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Operational Resilience & Critical Infrastructure

New Hampshire's breach-notification law, RSA 359-C, requires notification to the NH Attorney General if even one New Hampshire resident is affected, and obliges entities to promptly determine the likelihood that exposed personal information will be misused. This is a comparatively low notification threshold relative to peer states, and it applies irrespective of institution size.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T3https://www.constangy.com/data-privacy-us-nhretrieved
  2. T3https://www.constangy.com/data-privacy-us-nhretrieved
  3. T3https://www.americanbanker.com/news/vpn-vulnerability-leads-to-data-breaches-at-70-banksretrieved
  4. T1https://www.banking.nh.gov/consumer-assistanceretrieved

#

NH imposes no state-specific card-scheme rules beyond the federal Durbin framework; the state remains among the most permissive on surcharging, having declined interchange caps (HB1319, HB682), leaving scheme rules and the national interchange settlement as the operative layer.

Standing sub-brief166 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Scheme & Network Compliance

New Hampshire is the only New England state allowing unrestricted credit-card surcharging, with no state cap beyond the federal ceiling -- a marked contrast with Massachusetts, Maine and Connecticut, which ban surcharging entirely. This positions New Hampshire merchants distinctly within a regional patchwork of state-level scheme-adjacent rules.

Legislative attempts to alter that landscape have failed: NH HB1319, a proposed 1% interchange-fee cap, and HB682 were both introduced but did not become law. Nationally, merchant groups continue to contest the 2026 Visa/Mastercard interchange class settlement -- a 0.1-percentage-point cut to posted rates and a 1.25% cap running eight years -- as inadequate, a dispute that affects New Hampshire merchants operating under the settlement's terms even though the litigation itself is not NH-specific.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T3https://www.nickel.com/surcharge-laws/new-hampshireretrieved
  2. T3https://merchantcostconsulting.com/lower-credit-card-processing-fees/new-hampshire-surcharge-laws/retrieved
  3. T3https://csnews.com/new-hampshire-legislators-taking-credit-card-feesretrieved
  4. T3https://www.paymentsdive.com/news/merchants-assail-card-fees-pact/807846/retrieved

#

NH's corridor exposure is dominated by federal domestic rails: several NH banks and the state's largest credit union have adopted FedNow; the market is integrated with the MA/New England corridor via cross-border credit-union mergers.

Standing sub-brief167 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Payment Corridor Dynamics

Six New Hampshire-headquartered depository institutions -- Claremont Savings Bank, First Seacoast Bank, Meredith Village Savings Bank, Merrimack County Savings Bank, Savings Bank of Walpole, and Service Credit Union -- are FedNow participants, part of a national base exceeding 1,400 participants two years after the service's launch. This places New Hampshire's community-banking sector squarely within the leading edge of instant-payments adoption relative to peer small-state markets.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T3https://www.nerdwallet.com/banking/learn/banks-that-use-fednowretrieved
  2. T1https://www.frbservices.org/news/fed360/issues/071625/fednow-service-two-years-growth-innovationretrieved
  3. T3https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/metro-credit-union-and-members-plus-credit-union-announce-intent-to-merge-powered-by-partnership-302732894.htmlretrieved

#

NH's payments industry structure is anchored by Bottomline Technologies (Thoma Bravo-owned) alongside Fidelity's Merrimack payments operations and Service Credit Union; the national bank-CU consolidation wave is reshaping the NE community-banking landscape.

Standing sub-brief160 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Industry Structure & Commercial Dynamics

Portsmouth, New Hampshire-headquartered Bottomline Technologies, founded in 1989, has been a Thoma Bravo private-equity portfolio company since 2022. The firm serves more than 1,200 financial institutions and over 10,000 businesses, moving more than $16 trillion in payments annually with approximately 2,933 employees -- New Hampshire's flagship commercial payments entity and a bellwether for private-equity-owned B2B payments consolidation nationally.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T3https://www.thomabravo.com/portfolio/bottomlineretrieved
  2. T3https://leadiq.com/c/bottomline-technologies/5a1d8a9c2400002400646a64retrieved
  3. T3https://www.oca.nh.gov/news-and-media/please-dont-help-me-pay-my-next-vacationretrieved
  4. T3https://www.cutoday.info/THE-feature/Why-Healthy-Credit-Unions-Are-Choosing-To-Merge-And-Why-2026-Could-Break-Recordsretrieved
  5. T3https://www.indeed.com/q-fintech-l-manchester,-nh-jobs.htmlretrieved

The NH Banking Department has issued consent orders against non-bank processors for unlicensed transmission (RAM Payment, Feb 2026) and a Bitcoin-ATM operator (River Financial, Dec 2025); RSA 358-A provides a private right of action with treble damages, layered onto national interchange antitrust litigation.

Horizon · 2026-Q3 (±quarter)Chicago merchant damages trial vs. Visa/Mastercard (GrubHub-led interchange litigation)proposed · TT3
Standing sub-brief193 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Legal & Litigation

The NH Banking Department has been an active enforcer against unlicensed payments activity across two 2025-2026 consent orders. In February 2026, the Department found that RAM Payment, LLC, a Delaware-based company, provided third-party account-management and payment-processing services for debt-resolution consumers in New Hampshire prior to obtaining its money-transmitter license, in violation of RSA 399-G:2, I. In December 2025, a parallel consent order against River Financial Inc., a Bitcoin ATM operator, established that crypto-to-fiat conversion activity likewise requires licensure (see W2, W7).

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T1https://mm.nh.gov/files/uploads/banking/enforcement-orders/20260205-co-rampaymentllc-fullyexecuted-redacted.pdfretrieved
  2. T1https://www.banking.nh.gov/sites/g/files/ehbemt621/files/enforcement-orders/2025.12.09-river-financial-consent-order-2024-22674_signed_redacted.pdfretrieved
  3. T3https://grokipedia.com/page/New_Hampshire_Consumer_Protection_Actretrieved
  4. T3https://www.paymentsdive.com/news/merchants-assail-card-fees-pact/807846/retrieved

#

NH merchant acquiring operates under federal Durbin rules and unrestricted state-level surcharging, governed by card-network disclosure requirements and RSA 358-A; no NH-specific acquiring or high-risk-merchant regime exists.

Open gap — wpm-int-3No NH-specific high-risk-merchant/MCC regime exists or was located; W8 coverage rests entirely on federal/network-level surcharge and disclosure rules.no under-indexing note recorded
Standing sub-brief126 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Merchant Acquiring & Risk

New Hampshire merchants implementing surcharge programs must operate within federal maximums -- a general 4% cap and a 3% Visa network cap -- with proper point-of-sale disclosure; violations expose merchants to card-network fines, FTC exposure, and complaints to the NH Attorney General's Consumer Protection Bureau. No New Hampshire-specific high-risk-merchant or MCC regime was identified this cycle; the state's merchant-acquiring risk framework rests entirely on federal and network-level rules layered onto the state's permissive surcharging posture (see W4).

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T3https://www.nickel.com/surcharge-laws/new-hampshireretrieved
  2. T3https://www.getflexpoint.com/credit-card-surcharging-us-states/new-hampshireretrieved
  3. T3https://ebizcharge.com/blog/credit-card-surcharging-a-state-by-state-legal-analysis/retrieved

#

Product innovation in NH is led by Bottomline's 2025-2026 product releases, community-bank FedNow rollout, and NH's crypto-friendly legislative programme (state Bitcoin allocation; HB639 status contested/unconfirmed).

Movement — CHANGEDDraftKings promo-deduction cap raised 10%→40% of retail GGR.Contract Amendment No. 1 executed and approved.
Standing sub-brief167 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-05

Product Innovation & Market Development

New Hampshire's 2025-2026 legislative programme signals an active, if contested, push to court digital-asset payment innovation: proposals include a state Bitcoin-reserve allocation of up to 5% of public funds, a proposed $100 million Bitcoin-backed bond, and the pending HB 639 'Blockchain Basic Law.' HB639's own enactment status remains unresolved (see W2), which caps confidence in describing New Hampshire's crypto posture as settled policy rather than aspirational legislative activity.

Periodic update · new data 2026-09-08 · run wpm-2026-09-05

Product Innovation & Market Development

The New Hampshire Lottery Commission exercised the first of two available two-year extension options on its exclusive sports-wagering contract with DraftKings, formalised as Amendment No. 1 dated December 12, 2025 and reflected in the Governor and Executive Council's February 2026 agenda record. The amendment's substantive payments-relevant change is a restructuring of the promotional-payment mechanics: the retail promotional-deduction cap rises from 10 percent to 40 percent of retail gross gaming revenue, a material change to how promotional spend is netted against revenue before the state's share is calculated on New Hampshire's only regulated online-wagering payment rail. This is confirmed via a Tier-1 government-record source.

A second, lower-confidence development touches the same statutory vehicle that reshaped New Hampshire's licensing perimeter this cycle: HB639 is reported, on Tier-3 corroboration, to bar New Hampshire state and local authorities from imposing taxes, fees, or licensing conditions specifically because a payment is made using a digital asset, and to protect self-custody wallet use. For product and market-development purposes, this functions as a market-access-relevant constraint on future state rulemaking that might otherwise touch crypto-payment products, effectively pre-empting a category of state-level friction before it could be introduced, though the precise scope of this provision rests on secondary-source corroboration rather than direct statutory-text confirmation this cycle.

Outlook

Whether the DraftKings promotional-deduction change produces observable shifts in retail promotional-offer structuring, and whether HB639's digital-asset-payment-neutrality provision is tested against any future NH rulemaking attempt, are the two developments to watch. No other product-innovation or market-development signal specific to New Hampshire payments was identified this cycle.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T3https://www.bottomline.com/newsroom/press-releases/bottomline-strengthens-business-payments-fraud-defense-integrated-multi-layered-protectionretrieved
  2. T3https://www.bottomline.com/newsroom/press-releases/bottomline-enhances-paymode-digital-banking-help-banks-reduce-check-fraudretrieved
  3. T3https://bitcoinworld.co.in/new-hampshire-blockchain-basics-act-takes-effect/retrieved
  4. T3https://www.cryptotimes.io/2026/07/04/new-hampshire-registers-hb639-blockchain-rights-crypto-protections/retrieved
  5. T3https://www.independentbanker.org/article/2025/07/01/instant-payments-insights-every-community-bank-needsretrieved

#

Consumer/APP-fraud protection runs through the AG's Consumer Protection & Antitrust Bureau (RSA 358-A) and its Elder Abuse and Financial Exploitation Unit; the Banking Department separately warns that non-bank payment apps lack FDIC insurance.

Standing sub-brief120 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Consumer Protection & APP Fraud

The NH Department of Justice's Consumer Protection & Antitrust Bureau enforces state and federal unfair-and-deceptive-practices laws and investigates and prosecutes the most serious cases of elder abuse and financial exploitation, running sustained 2025-2026 scam-prevention and AI-fraud-awareness campaigns. Separately, the NH Banking Department explicitly warns consumers that PayPal, Venmo, Cash App and other non-bank payment apps are not protected by federal deposit insurance, directing consumers to CFPB guidance on payment-app risk.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T1https://www.doj.nh.gov/citizens/consumer-protection-antitrust-bureauretrieved
  2. T1https://www.doj.nh.gov/news-and-media/new-hampshire-department-justice-warns-ai-technology-bringing-new-financial-scamsretrieved
  3. T1https://www.doj.nh.gov/news-and-media/attorney-generals-office-expanding-free-scam-prevention-trainingretrieved
  4. T1https://www.banking.nh.gov/consumer-assistanceretrieved
  5. T1https://www.doj.nh.gov/news-and-media/consumer-alert-scam-text-messages-falsely-claim-be-nh-dmv-threaten-licenseretrieved

#

W11 baseline for US-NH is Sentinel.gi-fed by design; no accessible Sentinel content was found this cycle, so the module carries only statutory BSA/AML hooks in RSA 399-G as context, per the no-original-analysis constraint.

Standing sub-brief138 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

AML/CFT & Financial Crime

This module is Sentinel.gi-sourced by design, and no Sentinel.gi-branded payments-context feed was accessible for US-NH this cycle. In its absence, the only content carried forward is statutory context embedded in RSA 399-G: RSA 399-G:19 requires licensees to file written BSA compliance plans, and RSA 399-G:15 (Money Laundering Reports) sits as a dedicated statutory provision alongside the federal Bank Secrecy Act filing requirement. This is carried as statutory context only, not as original illicit-finance analysis, which remains out of World Payments Monitor scope; readers seeking AML/CFT analysis for New Hampshire should consult the Sentinel.gi feed directly when available.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T1https://www.banking.nh.gov/sites/g/files/ehbemt621/files/inline-documents/sonh/chapter-399-g_effectiveuntil2024october21.pdfretrieved
  2. T1https://law.justia.com/codes/new-hampshire/2015/title-xxxvi/chapter-399-gretrieved

#

NH community banks/credit unions access Fed settlement infrastructure, including FedNow, predominantly through correspondent relationships rather than holding direct master accounts for every rail.

Standing sub-brief174 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Correspondent Banking, Settlement & Access

The analytical spine of this module is the bank-versus-nonbank access asymmetry in settlement infrastructure. New Hampshire's community banks and credit unions predominantly access Federal Reserve settlement infrastructure, including FedNow, through correspondent or respondent relationships with bankers' banks or corporate credit unions, rather than holding direct master accounts for every rail. FedNow itself requires financial institutions to maintain sufficient funds in their own Federal Reserve master account, or that of a designated correspondent, to cover outgoing payments, ensuring immediate and final settlement without credit risk.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T1https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/08/11/2020-17539/service-details-on-federal-reserve-actions-to-support-interbank-settlement-of-instant-paymentsretrieved
  2. T3https://bankingjournal.aba.com/2025/02/4-things-to-know-about-the-fednow-service/retrieved
  3. T3https://www.aciworldwide.com/fednowretrieved

#

Trailing-12-month commercial activity centers on Portsmouth-headquartered Bottomline's steady cadence of product releases under Thoma Bravo ownership and the April 2026 Metro Credit Union/Members Plus Credit Union merger announcement with direct NH-county exposure, set against a broader accelerating 2025-2026 US credit-union consolidation wave.

Standing sub-brief189 words · last cycle wpm-2026-07-05

Commercial Intelligence (M&A, Investment & Product)

Three discrete commercial events anchor this cycle's New Hampshire commercial-intelligence baseline. Bottomline Technologies launched Payments Fraud Defense on January 8, 2026, an AI-driven fraud platform aligned with Nacha's 2026 fraud-monitoring rules that integrates behavioral analytics and session replay; deal/product value was not publicly disclosed. On March 31, 2026, Bottomline introduced a Paymode for Digital Banking enhancement to help banks identify check-heavy business customers and migrate them to Premium ACH; again, value was not publicly disclosed.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T3https://www.bottomline.com/newsroom/press-releases/bottomline-strengthens-business-payments-fraud-defense-integrated-multi-layered-protectionretrieved
  2. T3https://www.bottomline.com/newsroom/press-releases/bottomline-enhances-paymode-digital-banking-help-banks-reduce-check-fraudretrieved
  3. T3https://www.bottomline.com/newsroom/press-releases/bottomline-breaks-new-ground-paymode-digital-bankingretrieved
  4. T3https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/metro-credit-union-and-members-plus-credit-union-announce-intent-to-merge-powered-by-partnership-302732894.htmlretrieved
  5. T3https://www.cutoday.info/THE-feature/Why-Healthy-Credit-Unions-Are-Choosing-To-Merge-And-Why-2026-Could-Break-Recordsretrieved
No modules match.

Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across groups.

Editorial metadata

Provenance only. Nothing below gates publication or affects the render.

Editorial metadata for United States – New Hampshire
FieldValue
trust.lawyer_review.statusnever_reviewed
trust.lawyer_review.reviewernot recorded
trust.content_sourceai_generated

Provenance and declared absence

Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.

Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.

Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.

Suppressed by doctrine: derived risk score; per-module RAG traffic light; derived_scores = {"legal_accessibility": {"per_product": {"account_to_account": "regulated", "cards": "regulated", "prepaid_emoney": "licensed-emi"}}}.

Band honesty: uncertainty bands are computed against a frozen build clock of 2026-09-11. A year-precision row is never promoted into a tighter band.

Orphan deltas: 0 cycle_delta row(s) target non-module objects and are listed in the rail rather than attached to a card.

Envelope: baseline resolved at jurisdiction_json.baseline; 14 module(s), 59 finding(s), 160 source(s) in the cumulative register.