MHschema world-payments-v1trajectory: not recorded
Last updated · 14 modules · 54 sourced
findings · 135 sources in the cumulative register
14Modulesbaseline.modules[]
54Findingsmodules[].findings[]
33Tier-1 sourcesrun_metadata.t1_source_count
Confidence mix(sums to 14 rendered modules; click to filter)
Jurisdiction brief
Lead Signal
The Marshall Islands enters this cycle with its payments architecture in transition on three fronts at once: a consolidated regulator moving toward operational status, a single correspondent banking relationship under sustained threat, and a state-issued digital instrument facing explicit multilateral resistance to its intended scale. Public Law 2025-32, the Monetary Authority Act 2025, passed by the Nitijela, creates the legal basis for a new consolidated regulator, the Marshall Islands Monetary Authority (MIMA), to absorb banking, MSB and payment-systems oversight; implementation is in transition and not yet fully operational. Until MIMA displaces it, banks and financial services providers must be Cabinet-approved-licensed by the Banking Commissioner under 17 MIRC Ch.1 §156 of the Banking Act 1987, per the Banks and FSPs Licensing and Fees Regulations 2020, before transacting business in RMI. That produces a near-term period of overlapping authority between the incoming and incumbent licensing regimes. The most acute vulnerability sits in correspondent banking: the Bank of the Marshall Islands' only remaining correspondent relationship is with First Hawaiian Bank, which has sought to end the relationship since 2014 and retains it only until BOMI finds another correspondent bank, against a backdrop in which RMI has lost approximately 700 correspondent banking relationships since 2008. That fragility is the direct backdrop to USDM1, the digital sovereign bond distributed via the Lomalo wallet from November-December 2025 to pay the ENRA universal basic income. The IMF's 2025 Article IV Consultation characterises USDM1 as a 'digital sovereign bond' distinct from a privately issued stablecoin, and recommends the authorities not proceed with its planned global launch given insufficient capacity to mitigate associated risks. The initiative follows the repeal, in August 2025, of the Sovereign Currency Act of 2018, which had declared the Sovereign (SOV) legal tender, after years of IMF opposition and non-implementation. Early uptake data reinforces the IMF's caution: of the first round of ENRA disbursements, about 60% went out as direct bank deposits and the remainder as bank checks, with only about 12 people opting to receive payment in USDM1 itself.
Other Developments
Away from the correspondent-banking and digital-currency headline, the FDIC adopted a final rule, effective 22 April 2026, providing that it will insure deposits of all branches of U.S.-insured depository institutions in the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau. Card infrastructure remains a separate point of fragility: the Bank of the Marshall Islands' card system functions as a closed-loop domestic network unsupported by Visa or Mastercard and cannot accept international cards, contributing to card-transaction costs far above global averages. No domestic PCI DSS mandate, interchange regulation, or card-scheme technical-standards regime was identified. Merchant acquiring is correspondingly thin and largely informal: only larger hotels, restaurants and stores in Majuro accept cards, and Bank of Guam provides the main card-acceptance and dispute/chargeback infrastructure available locally. Consumer protection in payments is similarly underdeveloped: there is no dedicated APP-fraud reimbursement scheme, financial ombudsman, or standalone consumer-protection statute, with safeguards arising indirectly from AML/KYC account-opening requirements and voluntary payment-method choice in the ENRA programme design. On financial-crime standing, RMI is an APG member subject to mutual evaluation of its AML/CFT/CPF measures and is not currently on the FATF grey or black lists, with core domestic AML measures dating to the early 2000s, including the USD 10,000 cash-transaction reporting threshold enforced by the Banking Commission. On the commercial side, Crossmint closed a Series A-II funding round on 24 September 2025, with Flourish Ventures among the investors, and the Stellar Development Foundation issued a multimillion-dollar grant in December 2025 to fund USDM1's development.
Cross-Monitor Connections
The IMF's Article IV recommendations tie continued correspondent-banking access to AML/CFT strengthening, and the AML/CFT position carried here is sourced from the Sentinel feed as payments-context only. The original analysis of illicit-finance risk and the drivers of correspondent-bank de-risking behind the Bank of the Marshall Islands' single remaining relationship belongs to the Financial Intelligence Monitor rather than to this brief.
Outlook
The signals to watch next are the implementation timeline for MIMA and whether it pursues direct U.S. Federal Reserve master account access, the outcome of BOMI's search for a replacement or additional correspondent banking relationship beyond First Hawaiian Bank, the status of a proposed US funding amendment that would permit direct USDM1 UBI disbursement rather than routing through paper checks, and the passage or enactment status of RMI's draft Cyber Security Act and Cyber Crimes Act. Each bears directly on whether RMI's payments system stabilises around the new consolidated regulator and a diversified settlement channel, or remains dependent on a single correspondent relationship and a digital-bond pilot that the IMF has so far declined to endorse for wider use.
trust tier: ai_unverified
Regulatory Status
The Marshall Islands regulates banks and financial services providers under Cabinet-approved licensing by the Banking Commissioner pursuant to the Banking Act 1987, with a new consolidated regulator, the Marshall Islands Monetary Authority, created by the Monetary Authority Act 2025 and currently in transition toward operational status. Correspondent banking access is the jurisdiction's most acute payments vulnerability: the Bank of the Marshall Islands' sole remaining correspondent relationship, with First Hawaiian Bank, has been under threat of termination since 2014, following the loss of approximately 700 correspondent banking relationships since 2008. The jurisdiction's principal digital-money initiative, USDM1, distributed via the Lomalo wallet, has drawn an IMF recommendation against global scaling, while RMI's earlier Sovereign Currency Act of 2018 was repealed in August 2025. RMI is an APG member subject to AML/CFT mutual evaluation and is not on the FATF grey or black lists.
Outlook
The implementation trajectory of the Monetary Authority Act 2025, the outcome of BOMI's search for a replacement correspondent banking relationship, and the scale of USDM1 adoption are the three variables most likely to define the jurisdiction's payments risk profile over the coming cycles.
14 of 14 modules
Signal
Density
Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.
RMI licenses banks and non-bank financial-service providers (incl. money-transfer/MSB and virtual-asset businesses) under the Banking Act 1987 via the Banking Commissioner, with Cabinet approval required for grant/revocation. A 2025 Monetary Authority Act creates a new consolidated regulator (MIMA) to absorb banking, MSB and payment-systems oversight; implementation is in transition, not yet fully operational.
Movement — NEWBanking Act 1987 licensing regime + Monetary Authority Act 2025 (MIMA) in transition.Initial baseline finding established this cycle.
Key judgment — High · impact ELEVATEDRMI's payments-regulatory architecture is mid-transition: the Monetary Authority Act 2025 legislates a consolidated regulator (MIMA) to absorb banking, MSB and payment-systems oversight, but implementation has not yet displaced the existing Banking Commissioner/Cabinet-approval licensing regime, creating a near-term period of dual/overlapping authority.claims: wpm-2026-W1a-001, wpm-2026-W1a-002
Open gap — wpm-int-5Primary legislative text of the Monetary Authority Act 2025 (PL 2025-32) could not be retrieved live (rminitijela.com throttled, HTTP 503); claim relies on secondary Ministry of Finance corroboration.no under-indexing note recorded
Standing sub-brief180 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-08
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
Banks and financial services providers must be Cabinet-approved-licensed by the Banking Commissioner under 17 MIRC Ch.1 §156 of the Banking Act 1987, per the Banks and FSPs Licensing and Fees Regulations 2020, before transacting business in RMI; this licensing gate applies to both bank and non-bank payments entrants seeking market access. Public Law 2025-32, the Monetary Authority Act 2025, passed by the Nitijela, creates the legal basis for a new consolidated regulator, the Marshall Islands Monetary Authority (MIMA), to absorb banking, MSB and payment-systems oversight; implementation is in transition and not yet fully operational. Because MIMA has not yet displaced the Banking Commissioner structure, licensing and prudential authority currently sits in a near-term period of overlapping regimes, with the primary legislative text of the Monetary Authority Act itself not independently retrievable this cycle and the claim resting on secondary Ministry of Finance corroboration.
Outlook
The implementation timeline for MIMA, including whether it pursues direct U.S. Federal Reserve master account access, is the determining near-term variable for how licensing and market-access authority is exercised going forward.
No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.
Conduct and AML-linked safeguarding sit with the Banking Commissioner under the Banking Act 1987 framework: cash transactions/transfers over USD 10,000 must be reported, shell banks and correspondent relationships with them are banned, and licences can be suspended/revoked (with Cabinet approval) on suspicion of money laundering. There is no dedicated financial-promotions statute; enforcement of mis-promotion is largely externalised to foreign regulators (e.g. UK FCA) warning against unauthorised RMI-registered entities.
Movement — NEWAML-linked conduct/safeguarding via Banking Commissioner; no dedicated promotions statute.Initial baseline finding established this cycle.
Open gap — wpm-int-2No settlement-finality or safeguarded-funds insolvency-priority statute identified for RMI payments/e-money.no under-indexing note recorded
Standing sub-brief104 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-08
Conduct, Safeguarding & Promotions
Cash transactions and transfers exceeding USD 10,000 are reported by banks to the Banking Commission, which has authority to investigate financial records when necessary. This reporting duty sits within the Banking Act 1987 framework and applies specifically to bank-PSP conduct rather than to non-bank payment institutions, for which no distinct conduct or safeguarding regime was identified this cycle. No dedicated financial-promotions statute was identified for RMI-registered payment entities.
Outlook
Whether the incoming Monetary Authority Act 2025 framework extends conduct and safeguarding obligations to non-bank payment institutions, distinct from the bank-focused reporting duty currently in force, remains an open near-term question.
No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.
RMI's 2018 Sovereign Currency Act (creating the decentralised legal-tender 'SOV' crypto-asset) was repealed in August 2025 after years of IMF opposition and non-implementation. In its place, the government launched (Nov-Dec 2025) the Lomalo digital wallet and USDM1 -- a US-Treasury-collateralised, New York-law-governed digital sovereign bond used to distribute the ENRA universal basic income -- which the IMF has characterised as a 'digital sovereign bond' rather than a private stablecoin, and against whose global scaling the IMF's 2025 Article IV explicitly recommended the authorities not proceed.
Movement — NEWSovereign Currency Act repealed; USDM1/Lomalo launched against IMF caution.Initial baseline finding established this cycle.
Key judgment — High · impact HIGHThe Lomalo/USDM1 programme is a live test of whether a state-issued, US-Treasury-collateralised digital instrument can substitute for correspondent-banking-dependent cash distribution, but IMF's explicit recommendation against global scaling signals continued multilateral resistance and constrains uptake — reflected in only ~12 UBI recipients opting into USDM1 in the first disbursement round.claims: wpm-2026-W2-001, wpm-2026-W9-001
Standing sub-brief98 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-08
Stablecoins & Digital Money
The Sovereign Currency Act of 2018, which declared the Sovereign (SOV) legal tender, was repealed in August 2025 after years of IMF opposition and non-implementation. The IMF's 2025 Article IV Consultation characterises USDM1 as a 'digital sovereign bond' distinct from a privately issued stablecoin, and recommends the authorities not proceed with its planned global launch given insufficient capacity to mitigate associated risks.
Outlook
Whether RMI pursues USDM1's global launch against the IMF's explicit recommendation, or confines the instrument to its current domestic UBI-disbursement role, is the key determinant of how this tracker develops next.
No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.
RMI has no enacted operational-resilience, critical-infrastructure or cybersecurity statute specific to payments; a draft Cyber Security Act and Cyber Crimes Act remain unpassed. Operational fragility in practice is driven by the payments infrastructure itself -- a closed-loop domestic card network, unreliable/cash-limited ATMs, and power-outage exposure across dispersed atolls.
Movement — NEWNo enacted cyber/critical-infrastructure statute; closed-loop card network.Initial baseline finding established this cycle.
Open gap — wpm-int-1No enacted RMI cybersecurity/critical-infrastructure statute identified; draft Cyber Security Act and Cyber Crimes Act status pending, no confirmed enactment date.no under-indexing note recorded
Standing sub-brief63 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-08
Operational Resilience & Critical Infrastructure
BOMI's card system functions as a closed-loop domestic network unsupported by Visa or Mastercard and cannot accept international cards, contributing to card-transaction costs far above global averages. No enacted cyber or critical-infrastructure statute was identified this cycle.
Outlook
Passage of RMI's draft Cyber Security Act and Cyber Crimes Act remains unconfirmed and is a dated item to track.
No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.
There is no evidence of a domestic PCI DSS mandate, interchange regulation, or card-scheme technical-standards regime in RMI. The dominant domestic card infrastructure operates as a closed-loop network outside the Visa/Mastercard schemes, while Bank of Guam provides limited scheme-branded ATM/debit access under US scheme rules.
Movement — NEWNo PCI/interchange regime; domestic network outside Visa/Mastercard.Initial baseline finding established this cycle.
Open gap — wpm-int-3No PCI DSS mandate, interchange, or surcharging regulation identified in RMI's legislative register.no under-indexing note recorded
Standing sub-brief59 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-08
Scheme & Network Compliance
The dominant domestic card infrastructure operates as a closed-loop network outside the Visa/Mastercard schemes; no domestic PCI DSS mandate, interchange regulation, or card-scheme technical-standards regime was identified.
Outlook
Any scheme engagement with RMI's domestic network would first require the absent technical-standards regime to be built out, a gap unlikely to close in the near term.
No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.
RMI's principal payment corridor is USD-denominated flow with the United States, supplemented by Western Union/MoneyGram cash-based remittance corridors. Pacific remittance-corridor fees average roughly 10% and international USD wires can take up to a week to settle, prompting a push toward digital-wallet-based distribution (Lomalo/USDM1) as an alternative settlement channel.
Movement — NEWUSD corridor with US; ~10% remittance fees, week-long wire settlement.Initial baseline finding established this cycle.
Standing sub-brief82 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-08
Payment Corridor Dynamics
Pacific remittance-corridor fees average roughly 10% (triple the UN SDG target) and international USD wires can take up to a week to settle because of correspondent-banking constraints. This corridor friction sits on top of RMI's structural correspondent-banking fragility, with the US-MH USD corridor dependent on a single correspondent relationship.
Outlook
The Lomalo/USDM1 pilot is being tested as an alternative settlement channel for this corridor, though its uptake so far has been modest relative to conventional bank deposits and checks.
No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.
RMI's domestic banking market is a duopoly of BOMI and a Bank of Guam branch. Non-bank fintech entrants are recent and externally driven: Crossmint built the Lomalo wallet and the Stellar Development Foundation funded USDM1's blockchain rail, marking the first substantive private/foreign fintech presence in RMI's payments market.
Movement — NEWTwo-bank duopoly; Crossmint/Stellar first fintech entrants.Initial baseline finding established this cycle.
Standing sub-brief89 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-08
Industry Structure & Commercial Dynamics
Crossmint, an infrastructure provider, and the Stellar Development Foundation, a grant funder, built and funded the Lomalo wallet and USDM1 blockchain rail, marking the first substantive private or foreign fintech presence in RMI's payments market. This entry sits against a domestic banking market otherwise limited to a small number of established bank incumbents.
Outlook
Whether Crossmint and Stellar's involvement deepens into a durable non-bank market presence, or remains confined to the single Lomalo/USDM1 deployment, is the structural question for RMI's payments industry going forward.
No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.
No active court litigation targeting RMI payments/banking regulation was identified this run; regulatory/legal pressure has come via international soft-law channels -- repeated IMF Article IV critiques, the EU's on-off blacklist listing, and a historic FDIC alert against fraudulent RMI-issued bank guarantee instruments.
Movement — NEWNo active litigation; IMF/EU/FDIC soft-law pressure history.Initial baseline finding established this cycle.
Standing sub-brief74 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-08
Legal & Litigation
In 1996 the FDIC issued Special Alert FIL-57-96 after banks received inquiries about fraudulent 'Bank Guarantee' instruments issued by the Marshall Islands Development Bank; RMI subsequently announced the instruments were withdrawn and voided. No active domestic court litigation targeting RMI payments or banking regulation was identified this cycle.
Outlook
This remains a dated historical reference point rather than a live litigation risk; no near-term developments are expected absent a new filing.
No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.
Merchant acquiring in RMI is thin and largely informal: cash dominates retail commerce, only larger hotels/restaurants/stores accept cards, and Bank of Guam provides the main card-acceptance and dispute/chargeback infrastructure available locally.
Movement — NEWThin/informal merchant acquiring; Bank of Guam main infrastructure.Initial baseline finding established this cycle.
Standing sub-brief49 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-08
Merchant Acquiring & Risk
Merchant acquiring is thin and largely informal: only larger hotels, restaurants and stores in Majuro accept cards, and Bank of Guam provides the main card-acceptance and dispute/chargeback infrastructure available locally.
Outlook
Thin acquiring infrastructure signals limited near-term addressable market for any merchant-acquiring vendor considering entry.
No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.
The dominant product-innovation story in RMI payments is the Lomalo digital wallet / USDM1 sovereign-bond-token pairing, launched November 2025 to distribute the ENRA universal basic income and positioned as a workaround to correspondent-banking fragility; uptake of the digital-asset option has been modest relative to direct deposit and cheques.
Movement — NEWLomalo/USDM1 launched Nov 2025 for ENRA UBI; modest uptake.Initial baseline finding established this cycle.
Standing sub-brief93 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-08
Product Innovation & Market Development
Following the November 2025 launch distributing the ENRA universal basic income, about 60% of first-round payments were direct bank deposits, the remainder bank checks, and only about 12 people opted to receive payments in USDM1. This product sits at the centre of RMI's correspondent-banking workaround strategy, testing whether a digital-wallet rail can substitute for cash-based and correspondent-dependent distribution in a dispersed-atoll context.
Outlook
Subsequent disbursement rounds will show whether USDM1 uptake grows beyond its initial small base or whether direct deposit and cheques remain the dominant payment choice.
No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.
RMI has no dedicated APP-fraud reimbursement scheme, financial ombudsman, or standalone consumer-protection statute for payments; consumer safeguards are indirect, arising from AML/KYC account-opening requirements and voluntary payment-method choice built into the ENRA UBI programme design.
Movement — NEWNo APP-fraud reimbursement/ombudsman; indirect AML/KYC safeguards.Initial baseline finding established this cycle.
Open gap — wpm-int-4No dedicated APP-fraud mandatory reimbursement scheme or financial ombudsman identified for RMI consumers.Emerging/micro-jurisdiction consumer-protection infrastructure remains under-covered relative to Anglosphere/EU frameworks per bias-correction guidance.
Standing sub-brief61 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-08
Consumer Protection & APP Fraud
There is no dedicated APP-fraud reimbursement scheme, financial ombudsman, or standalone consumer-protection statute for payments in RMI; safeguards are indirect, arising from AML/KYC account-opening requirements and voluntary payment-method choice in the ENRA UBI programme design.
Outlook
This remains an under-indexed area of RMI's payments framework, with no announced plans this cycle to introduce dedicated consumer-protection legislation.
No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.
Sentinel.gi position: RMI is an APG member subject to APG-conducted mutual evaluation of its AML/CFT/CPF measures; it is not currently on the FATF grey or black lists. Core domestic AML measures date to the early 2000s. No original illicit-finance analysis is performed here; this is the Sentinel-fed payments-context position only.
Movement — NEWAPG member, not FATF grey/black-listed; Sentinel-fed baseline.Initial baseline finding established this cycle.
Open gap — wpm-int-6IMF 2025 Article IV press release and FATF/APG mutual evaluation report pages returned HTTP 403 on fetch; claims rely on cached/secondary corroboration rather than primary-document quotation.no under-indexing note recorded
Standing sub-brief97 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-08
AML/CFT & Financial Crime
This position is sourced from the Sentinel.gi feed as payments-context only; no original illicit-finance analysis is performed here. RMI is an APG member subject to mutual evaluation of its AML/CFT/CPF measures and is not currently on the FATF grey or black lists; core domestic AML measures date to the early 2000s, including the USD 10,000 cash-transaction reporting threshold, a shell-bank prohibition, and licence suspension or revocation powers tied to money-laundering suspicion.
Outlook
Readers seeking the underlying illicit-finance analysis and de-risking drivers behind this standing should consult the Financial Intelligence Monitor's Sentinel-fed coverage directly.
No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.
Correspondent banking access is RMI's single most acute payments-infrastructure vulnerability: since 2008 RMI has lost approximately 700 correspondent banking relationships, and BOMI's sole remaining CBR has been under threat of termination since 2014. A March 2026 FDIC final rule extended deposit-insurance coverage clarity to US-bank branches in RMI/FSM/Palau, effective 22 April 2026.
Movement — NEWAcute CBR fragility; FDIC final rule effective 22 Apr 2026.Initial baseline finding established this cycle.
Key judgment — Confirmed · impact CRITICALRMI's payments system is structurally exposed on correspondent banking access: a single remaining CBR (First Hawaiian Bank) under threat since 2014, following the loss of ~700 CBRs since 2008, makes the planned Monetary Authority (MIMA) and its proposed direct Fed account access the central near-term determinant of continued USD clearing capability.claims: wpm-2026-W12-001, wpm-2026-W12-002
Standing sub-brief128 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-08
Correspondent Banking, Settlement & Access
The defining asymmetry in this module is access: BOMI's only remaining correspondent banking relationship is with First Hawaiian Bank, which has sought to end the relationship since 2014 and retains it only until BOMI finds another correspondent bank, against a backdrop in which RMI has lost approximately 700 correspondent banking relationships since 2008. The FDIC adopted a final rule, effective 22 April 2026, providing that it will insure deposits of all branches of U.S.-insured depository institutions in the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau.
Outlook
The outcome of BOMI's search for a replacement or additional correspondent banking relationship beyond First Hawaiian Bank is the single most consequential near-term variable for continued USD clearing access.
No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.
Trailing-12-month commercial activity in RMI payments centres on the Lomalo/USDM1 build-out: Crossmint closed a Series A-II funding round in September 2025 shortly before deploying Lomalo, and the Stellar Development Foundation issued an undisclosed-amount grant in December 2025 to fund USDM1's development, alongside passage of the Monetary Authority Act 2025.
Movement — NEWCrossmint funding, Stellar grant, MIMA Act passage in trailing 12 months.Initial baseline finding established this cycle.
Standing sub-brief139 words · last cycle wpm-2026-09-08
Crossmint's latest funding round was a Series A-II on 24 September 2025, with Flourish Ventures among the investors; the company has raised USD 23.6M cumulatively over 8 rounds, though the amount for the September 2025 round itself was not publicly disclosed. The Stellar Development Foundation issued a multimillion-dollar grant in December 2025 to fund the development of USDM1, the RMI's digitally issued sovereign bond; the grant amount was not publicly disclosed. The Lomalo wallet and USDM1 launched in November-December 2025, replacing a cash-delivery UBI model in which physical dollars arrived quarterly by shipping container subject to purchase caps and withdrawal limits.
Outlook
The Lomalo/USDM1 launch stands as the first blockchain-based UBI disbursement product globally, and its continued build-out will depend on further disclosed or undisclosed funding from Crossmint and the Stellar Development Foundation.
No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.
Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across
groups.
Editorial metadata
Provenance only. Nothing below gates publication or affects the render.
Editorial metadata for MH
Field
Value
trust.lawyer_review.status
never_reviewed
trust.lawyer_review.reviewer
not recorded
trust.content_source
ai_generated
Provenance and declared absence
Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.
Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.
Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.