#
Non-bank payment services in Cameroon operate under the CEMAC/BEAC dual PSP/EMI licensing framework; Order No. 080/CAB of 28 May 2025 tightened the statutory definition of 'electronic means of payment', pulling any electronically-stored monetary value (including simple prepaid balances) squarely into EMI-regulated territory and narrowing PSP-licence structuring room.
This finding is confirmed at high confidence, sourced from legal-commentary reporting on the payment-service-provider-versus-electronic-money-issuer distinction in Cameroon, though it rests on a single T3 source and the primary text of Order No. 080/CAB itself was not directly retrieved this cycle. Market commentary associated with the reform points to rising capital-threshold expectations for payment-service-provider licensing, reported to be approaching the order of 500 million FCFA, though this figure should be treated as indicative market reporting rather than a confirmed statutory threshold pending retrieval of the primary legal text.
This development also sharpens the bank-versus-non-bank distinction that runs through Cameroon's payments landscape. Banks, which are prudentially supervised institutions in their own right, are less directly affected by the redefinition than non-bank payment institutions and electronic-money issuers, for whom the redefinition is the more consequential development: a non-bank PI/EMI now bears a materially narrower path to operating stored-value products without full EMI licensing than it did before Order No. 080/CAB, whereas a licensed bank offering the same functionality was arguably always within EMI-adjacent supervisory scope. Any market-access assessment for Cameroon should therefore differentiate explicitly between a bank-led entry strategy, which is comparatively less exposed to this cycle's redefinition, and a non-bank PI/EMI-led strategy, which now faces the most direct impact of the tightened definition.
Outlook
What would most change this assessment next cycle is retrieval of the primary text of Order No. 080/CAB, which would allow the reported capital-threshold figures to be confirmed or revised, and clarity on how the redefinition is being applied in practice to existing prepaid and stored-value products already operating in the Cameroonian market.
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
Cameroon's pool of licensed payment institutions has widened again. Konoom Cameroon has been cleared to launch mobile-money services after being granted a payment-institution licence under Order No. 681/MINFI of 21 July 2026, itself founded on a decision of the regional banking supervisor for Central Africa. The grant makes Konoom the third entity to hold this category of licence in the market, joining the two mobile-network-affiliated incumbents that have dominated the mobile-money segment for most of the past decade.
The development is incremental rather than structural: the licensing gateway itself has not changed, and the entity obtained authorisation through the same regional framework that governs payment institutions across the Central African monetary union. What the grant does confirm is that the gateway remains open to new entrants beyond the two established mobile-money operators, and that the regional supervisor continues to process and approve applications under the existing regime rather than pausing or tightening the route to entry at the authorisation stage itself.
Outlook
With a third licensed payment institution now cleared to operate, attention turns to how quickly Konoom can build distribution and transaction volume against two entrenched incumbents. The widening of the licensed pool is consistent with a market that continues to attract new mobile-money entrants under the regional licensing framework, even as the broader conduct and prudential rules applicable to that framework have not moved this period. No change to the licensing gateway itself is in view; the near-term story is one of new entrants using an established route rather than regulators redesigning it.
3 earlier distinct update(s)
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
Cameroon's market-access environment moved on two fronts. First, Konoom Cameroon obtained a payment-institution licence under Order No. 681/MINFI of 21 July 2026, grounded in a corresponding decision of the Central African Banking Commission, and became the third licensed payment institution operating in the market alongside the two incumbent mobile-money brands run by the established mobile-network operators. This is a straightforward expansion of the licensed-entity pool and, on the record available, a completed licensing event rather than a pending application.
Second, and on a separate track, the Central African Banking Commission used its 25 September 2026 annual meeting in Malabo to discuss risks tied to the circulation of customer funds across the chain linking payment providers, aggregators and banks, including exposure to fraud and compliance gaps in the mobile-money ecosystem. No new binding rule emerged from that discussion. The reporting rests on a single secondary account rather than a primary supervisory communiqué, so the finding is held at a correspondingly measured confidence, but the substance is notable: the Commission is on record as treating the structural complexity of the provider-aggregator-bank chain as a supervisory concern at the same moment the licensed-entity pool is expanding.
The juxtaposition matters for how licensing activity in Cameroon should be read going forward. A new independent payment institution entering a chain the supervisor has just flagged for fund-circulation risk, without yet having a binding safeguarding rule to operate against, is a different market-access picture than a licence granted into a settled, fully codified regime. Nothing in the record indicates Konoom's own authorisation was conditioned on new safeguarding requirements; the two developments are parallel rather than linked by any stated regulatory action tying them together.
Outlook
Whether the Central African Banking Commission converts its Malabo-meeting discussion into a formal rule governing fund circulation across the payment-provider/aggregator chain is the single most consequential open question for market access in this jurisdiction. Until it does, newly licensed entrants and prospective applicants alike operate against a supervisory expectation rather than a codified safeguarding requirement, and the licensing pool's growth from two incumbents to three, with further entry reportedly in preparation elsewhere in the market, is occurring without that architecture settled.
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
From August 2025, Cameroon's Ministry of Finance began enforcing the licensing article of the underlying CEMAC payment-institution regulation against mobile-money, digital-lending, crowdfunding and payment-processing operators. This represents a shift from a largely unenforced licensing framework to one with active enforcement pressure applied specifically to non-bank payment-adjacent operators, assessed as probable given that the underlying CEMAC and Ministry of Finance primary text was not independently retrieved this cycle and the finding rests on secondary corroboration.
The market-access consequence of this enforcement push is already visible in how new entrants are structuring their entry. Wave launched Cameroon operations via a bank-partnership route with Commercial Bank Cameroon rather than obtaining standalone e-money-issuer status, a choice consistent with a market environment where standalone non-bank licensing carries greater regulatory friction relative to partnering with an already-licensed bank. This bank-partnership pattern is itself only probable-confidence, tracked through secondary industry commentary rather than a primary regulatory filing, but it is a coherent market response to the enforcement signal and worth carrying explicitly given the bank-PSP versus non-bank-PI/EMI distinction that is central to this module.
Taken together, these two data points suggest Cameroon's payment-institution licensing landscape is moving toward a bifurcated structure: non-bank operators face heightened enforcement scrutiny and licensing friction, while bank-partnership routes offer a comparatively smoother path to market access for new entrants unwilling or unable to pursue standalone authorisation. Neither the enforcement action nor the Wave entry pattern has been confirmed against a primary regulatory or corporate filing this cycle, and the Tier-1 anchor quota for this module was not met, so both findings should be treated as directionally reliable rather than fully verified.
Outlook
The durability and scope of the Ministry of Finance's enforcement push is the key marker to watch: whether it extends further into additional payment-adjacent sub-sectors, is formalised into clearer published guidance, or is moderated, will determine whether the bank-partnership entry pattern becomes the dominant mode for new payment-services entrants in Cameroon or remains one option among several.
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
Cameroon's payments licensing and market-access perimeter tightened this cycle through two distinct mechanisms operating at different levels of the regulatory layer. At the supranational level, BEAC remains the CEMAC-wide monetary and payments-systems regulator, with COBAC handling regional banking supervision — an unchanged baseline that frames every national-level development below it. At the national level, the 2026 Finance Law introduced a significant-economic-presence standard, effective 1 January 2026, under which non-resident digital platforms generating more than FCFA 50 million in Cameroon revenue or serving more than 1,000 Cameroon users per year fall within the country's tax scope. This is a market-access-adjacent development rather than a licensing requirement per se, but it functions as a de facto barrier to low-friction offshore participation in the Cameroon digital-services market, payments-adjacent platforms included.
The second mechanism is the INTOUCH Cameroun sole-aggregator mandate, in force since 30 January 2025 under MINAT letter No. 000061/L/MINAT/SG/DAP/SDLP, which designates INTOUCH as the only government-approved aggregator for online-gambling payment flows and ordered other aggregators' gambling-related accounts suspended. This is a non-bank payment-institution/EMI-layer development rather than a bank-supervisory one: it restructures market access specifically for non-bank payment-service providers operating in the gambling-payments vertical, leaving the bank-supervised layer of the payments stack largely unaffected by this particular mandate. The bank-PSP versus non-bank-PI/EMI distinction is material here because the mandate operates entirely within the non-bank aggregator layer, concentrating market access in a single designated non-bank entity rather than altering bank-level payment licensing.
Taken together, these two developments describe a market-access environment that is tightening for both non-resident platform operators (via the tax-nexus standard) and non-bank domestic aggregators outside the designated gambling-payments channel (via the INTOUCH mandate), even as the underlying BEAC/COBAC supervisory architecture itself remains structurally unchanged.
Outlook
Watch for whether the SEP tax-nexus standard's enforcement, evidenced by the passed 15 March 2026 filing deadline, extends its practical reach to additional platform categories beyond the initial compliance wave, and whether the INTOUCH aggregator mandate is extended to payment verticals beyond gambling.
1 further periodic run re-emitted the standing brief unchanged and is not shown.
Sources and findings (17)
- T1https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=d9c478ed-6761-4988-812a-c78c4813a22dretrieved
- T3https://primetimelawoffice.com/how-to-obtain-payment-service-license-cameroon/retrieved
- T1https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=d9c478ed-6761-4988-812a-c78c4813a22dretrieved
- T2https://www.lawyard.org/blog-articles/cameroon-enforces-fintech-licensing-rule-as-august-2025-deadline-passes/retrieved
- T2https://launchbaseafrica.com/2025/06/16/fintech-unicorn-wave-has-landed-in-central-africa-but-so-has-a-regulatory-storm/retrieved
- T3https://www.legal500.com/guides/chapter/cameroon-fintech/retrieved
- T1https://dgtcfm.cm/en/microfinance-institution-licensing-cameroon/retrieved
- T2Konoom Cameroon — Konoom Cameroon — Payment-institution licence granted under Order No. 681/MINFI of 21 July 2026, based on COBAC Decision No. D-2026/092, becoming the third licensed payment institution in Cameroon
- T1BEAC — BEAC is the CEMAC-wide monetary/payments-systems regulator for Cameroon; COBAC supervises banking institutions regionally.
- T3INTOUCH Cameroun — Since 30 Jan 2025, INTOUCH Cameroun is the sole government-approved aggregator for all online-gambling payment flows, per MINAT letter No. 000061/L/MINAT/SG/DAP/SDLP.retrieved
- T32026 Finance Law (Cameroon) — 2026 Finance Law (Cameroon) — The 2026 Finance Law introduces a significant economic presence (SEP) nexus standard (FCFA 50m revenue or >1,000 CM users/year) effective 1 Jan 2026, bringing non-resident digital-service/platform revenue into CM tax scope.retrieved
- T1CEMAC Regulation No 04/18/CEMAC/UMAC/COBAC on Payment Services — CEMAC Regulation No 04/18/CEMAC/UMAC/COBAC on Payment Services — Restricts CEMAC payment-service provision to three authorised categories (credit institutions, microfinance institutions, licensed payment institutions), mandates a 500m CFA minimum capital for payment institutions, and was extended by a 28 Feb 2024 Ministry of Finance Decision (No 00000337/MINFI) to cover electronic/interoperable payment platforms via a Qualified Electronic Service Provider licence.retrieved
- T2Cameroon Ministry of Finance licensing-enforcement drive — Cameroon Ministry of Finance licensing-enforcement drive — From August 2025 the Ministry of Finance began enforcing Article 84 of Reg 04/18/CEMAC/UMAC/COBAC, requiring fintech operators (mobile money, digital lending, crowdfunding, payment processors) to hold formal payment-institution licences or face market suspension; Wave complied via an 11 June 2025 bank-partnership route with Commercial Bank Cameroon (CBC), excluding e-money issuance which remains separately licensed.retrieved
- T3COBAC minimum capital requirement — COBAC minimum capital requirement — Effective 1 January 2026, COBAC raised the minimum capital requirement for a credit-institution licence to 4 billion FCFA, a significant new barrier to entry for smaller fintechs seeking bank-tier status; COSUMAF certification is separately required for investment-based crowdfunding/robo-advisory platforms.retrieved
- T3Cameroon Ministry of Finance — Cameroon Ministry of Finance — From August 2025, Cameroon's Ministry of Finance began enforcing the licensing article of the underlying CEMAC payment-institution regulation against mobile-money, digital-lending, crowdfunding and payment-processing operators.retrieved
- T3Wave — Wave launched Cameroon operations via a bank-partnership route with Commercial Bank Cameroon rather than obtaining standalone e-money-issuer status.retrieved
- T1BEAC/COBAC CEMAC payment-services regulation R-2018/02 — BEAC/COBAC CEMAC payment-services regulation R-2018/02 — Three-tier payment-licensing regime (EME, EP, simplified registration) remains the operative framework; Mobile Money Corporation Ltd received an EP agrément in 2023, the most recent licensing event on record.retrieved