United States – Rhode Island Payments & Fintech Regulation

US-RI schema world-payments-v1 trajectory: not yet assessed

Last updated · 14 modules · 90 sourced findings · 132 sources in the cumulative register

United States federal law that applies in United States – Rhode Island is covered once, on the United States page. This page covers United States – Rhode Island’s own layer: its own law, regulators and enforcement.

Jurisdiction brief

Latest update · 3 November 2026

Lead Signal

Rhode Island has enacted a standalone cybersecurity statute, Senate Bill 603, effective 2 July 2025, that applies directly to nonbank financial institutions licensed by the state's Department of Business Regulation. The statute requires a written information-security program, an incident-response plan, and specific technical controls, including multi-factor authentication, access controls, encryption, annual penetration testing and biannual vulnerability scanning. Reporting on the law is explicit that it was modeled on the New York Department of Financial Services Part 500 framework but diverges from it, giving covered institutions some additional leeway relative to the New York breach-notification requirement. For nonbank payment institutions and e-money institutions licensed in Rhode Island, this converts what was previously a general expectation of reasonable security practice into a specific, codified set of operational requirements with a fixed effective date already in the past.

Key regulatory facts for United States – Rhode Island
Regulatory DimensionUnited States – Rhode Island Standing Position
JurisdictionUnited States – Rhode Island (US-RI)
Regulatory ScopePayments & Fintech Regulation (14 modules, 90 sourced findings)
Licensing, Authorisation & Market AccessRhode Island regulates payments licensing through a state money-transmitter regime (RI Gen.
Conduct, Safeguarding & PromotionsConduct and safeguarding obligations for RI currency transmission licensees are codified in RI Gen.
Stablecoins & Digital MoneyRhode Island treats virtual-currency business activity (including stablecoin transmission) as currency transmission requiring licensure under Ch.
Operational Resilience & Critical InfrastructureRhode Island enacted a standalone cybersecurity regime for DBR-licensed nonbank financial institutions (S603, effective July 2, 2025), modeled closely on NYDFS Part 500 but with a more lenient three-business-day...
Primary Instruments CitedUnited States – Rhode Island Official Instrument (dbr.ri.gov banking), United States – Rhode Island Official Instrument (webserver.rilegislature.gov 19-14-3-1-htm), United States – Rhode Island Official Instrument (dbr.ri.gov download), United States – Rhode Island Official Instrument (jwsuretybonds.com money-transmitter-bond), United States – Rhode Island Official Instrument (mortgage.nationwidelicensingsystem.org RI-Electronic-Money-Transfer-Com)
Last Confirmed / Updated2026-11-04 (132 sources in cumulative register)

#

Rhode Island regulates payments licensing through a state money-transmitter regime (RI Gen. Laws Title 19, Ch. 19-14 and 19-14.3), supervised by the Division of Banking within the Dept. of Business Regulation (DBR). Currency transmission, electronic money transfer, and virtual-currency business activity all route through a single Currency Transmitter License applied for via NMLS. The regime sits within the federal/state dual structure typical of US state MTL law, with statutory exemptions for banks/credit unions and a bond/net-worth floor.

Movement — NEWRI MTL regime for virtual-currency businesses confirmed with $50k bond / $100k net worth requirementFirst-write baseline capture for this JID.
Key judgment — Confirmed · impact ELEVATEDRhode Island relies entirely on its general money-transmitter statute for virtual-currency licensing, with no bespoke payments/EMI regime; the 2025 crypto-ATM law is the state's most consumer-facing payments-adjacent intervention this cycle.claims: wpm-2026-W36-001, wpm-2026-W36-004
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (15)
  1. T1https://dbr.ri.gov/banking-securities-and-charitable-organizations/bankingretrieved
  2. T1https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/Statutes/TITLE19/19-14.3/19-14.3-1.htm
  3. T1https://dbr.ri.gov/media/23641/downloadretrieved
  4. T4https://www.jwsuretybonds.com/states/rhode-island/money-transmitter-bondretrieved
  5. T2https://mortgage.nationwidelicensingsystem.org/slr/PublishedStateDocuments/RI-Electronic-Money-Transfer-Company-New-App-Checklist.pdfretrieved
  6. T4https://faisalkhan.com/solutions/licensing/money-transmitter-license-mtl/rhode-island-money-transmitter-license/retrieved
  7. T1Rhode Island Division of Banking — Rhode Island Division of Banking — All RI money transmitters, including virtual-currency businesses, must be licensed via NMLS with a $50,000 surety bond and minimum $100,000 net worth
  8. T1Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation — Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation — Virtual-currency kiosk operators must separately register each kiosk with DBR and obtain prior activation approval
  9. T4Rhode Island Division of Banking — Rhode Island Division of Banking — RI Division of Banking is aligning currency-transmitter licensing standards to the CSBS Money Transmitter Model Law for multistate examination harmonization
  10. T1Rhode Island Division of Banking (DBR) — Rhode Island Division of Banking (DBR) — Currency transmission, electronic money transfer, and virtual-currency business activity in Rhode Island all route through a single Currency Transmitter License (RI Gen. Laws Ch. 19-14/19-14.3) applied for via NMLS.retrieved
  11. T4Rhode Island money transmitters — Rhode Island money transmitters — A surety bond tiered by agent-location count (commercial sources indicate ~$50,000 base rising toward $150,000) and a minimum net worth of $100,000 verified by audited financials.retrieved
  12. T2Rhode Island Division of Banking (DBR) — Rhode Island Division of Banking (DBR) — Only partial Money Transmission Modernization Act (MTMA) provisions -- tangible net worth and permissible-investment standards via H.B. 7282 -- rather than full MTMA harmonization; CSBS's tracker does not list Rhode Island among full-adoption states as of mid-2026.
  13. T1Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation — Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation — Currency-transmission licensure of entities controlling virtual currency on behalf of RI residents, per R.I. Gen. Laws Title 19, Ch. 14.3
  14. T1Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation — Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation — Separate kiosk registration and quarterly location reporting for virtual currency kiosk operators
  15. T2Rhode Island General Assembly — Rhode Island General Assembly — CSBS Money Transmission Modernization Act alignment bill (H.B.5533/S.B.696) remains held for further study, unlike >30 states that have enacted MTMA provisions in whole or part

#

Conduct and safeguarding obligations for RI currency transmission licensees are codified in RI Gen. Laws 19-14.3-3.5 through 3.9, covering mandatory customer disclosures, prohibited acts (fraud, BSA/EFTA non-compliance, deceptive advertising), and virtual-currency safeguarding (maintaining sufficient VC holdings to satisfy customer entitlements). The Attorney General's Consumer Protection Unit provides an additional conduct backstop under the state Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (7)
  1. T1https://law.justia.com/codes/rhode-island/title-19/chapter-19-14-3/section-19-14-3-3-8/retrieved
  2. T2https://stevenscenter.wharton.upenn.edu/publications-50-state-review/retrieved
  3. T2https://stevenscenter.wharton.upenn.edu/publications-50-state-review/retrieved
  4. T1https://riag.ri.gov/what-we-do/protect-rhode-island-consumersretrieved
  5. T1https://law.justia.com/codes/rhode-island/title-19/chapter-19-14-3/section-19-14-3-3-8/retrieved
  6. T1Rhode Island currency transmission licensees — Rhode Island currency transmission licensees — BSA/FinCEN registration and EFTA/Regulation E, and are prohibited from unfair, deceptive, or fraudulent practices under RI Gen. Laws 19-14.3-3.8.retrieved
  7. T2Rhode Island virtual-currency licensees — Rhode Island virtual-currency licensees — Sufficient virtual-currency holdings to satisfy the aggregate entitlements of customers (RI Gen. Laws 19-14.3-3.6) -- a VC-custody reserve obligation.retrieved

#

Rhode Island treats virtual-currency business activity (including stablecoin transmission) as currency transmission requiring licensure under Ch. 19-14/19-14.3, with dedicated kiosk-operator licensing, disclosure, and reserve-sufficiency rules. A newly enacted 2026 law (signed by Gov. McKee, effective June 23, 2026) caps daily crypto-kiosk transaction values, reflecting a consumer-protection-driven tightening of the digital-money regime rather than a bespoke stablecoin issuance framework.

Open gap — wpm-int-1No RI-specific stablecoin (W2) instrument was identified this cycle; RI has no bespoke digital-money framework distinct from the federal layer.no under-indexing note recorded
No sub-brief written this cycleThe module carries open gaps but no narrative analysis was authored this cycle. Flagged for the next research pass.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (7)
  1. T2https://stevenscenter.wharton.upenn.edu/publications-50-state-review/retrieved
  2. T1https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/Statutes/TITLE19/19-14.3/19-14.3-3.9.htmretrieved
  3. T3https://www.moneylaundering.com/news/amid-federal-stall-us-states-tackle-cryptocurrency-atm-fraud/retrieved
  4. T3https://www.governing.com/policy/fearing-scams-states-add-regulations-to-crypto-atmsretrieved
  5. T3https://rhodeislandcurrent.com/2025/02/12/r-i-house-bill-would-limit-transactions-add-warning-labels-to-crypto-kiosks/retrieved
  6. T3Rhode Island (Gov. Dan McKee) — Rhode Island (Gov. Dan McKee) — Crypto-kiosk law (S 0016A / H 5121A) capping daily crypto-ATM transaction values at $2,000/day for new users and $5,000/day for existing users; signed into law on 26 June 2025 and in force since that date.
  7. T1Rhode Island virtual-currency kiosk operators — Rhode Island virtual-currency kiosk operators — Money transmitters, with each kiosk registered and DBR-approved prior to activation, plus quarterly kiosk-location reporting within 45 days of quarter-end (RI Gen. Laws 19-14.3-3.9).retrieved

#

Rhode Island enacted a standalone cybersecurity regime for DBR-licensed nonbank financial institutions (S603, effective July 2, 2025), modeled closely on NYDFS Part 500 but with a more lenient three-business-day breach notification window. This sits alongside the general RI Identity Theft Protection Act / data breach notification law (500-resident AG notice trigger), and was tested in practice by the 2024/2025 RIBridges state-benefits-system breach and its $6.3M Deloitte settlement.

Standing sub-brief · as of 3 November 2026 529 words · last cycle 2026-11-03

Operational Resilience & Critical Infrastructure

Rhode Island has given nonbank financial institutions licensed by its Department of Business Regulation a codified operational-resilience floor through Senate Bill 603, effective 2 July 2025. The statute requires a written information-security program, a formal incident-response plan, and a specific set of technical controls: multi-factor authentication, access controls, encryption, annual penetration testing, and vulnerability scanning conducted at least twice a year. For payment institutions and e-money institutions holding a Rhode Island nonbank license, this is a shift from a general reasonable-security expectation to an enumerated, testable list of controls with a fixed effective date that has already passed.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (7)
  1. T3https://www.alstonprivacy.com/rhode-islands-new-cybersecurity-law-for-nonbank-financial-institutions/retrieved
  2. T3https://www.americanbanker.com/news/rhode-island-writes-its-own-cybersecurity-rules-for-nonbanksretrieved
  3. T3https://www.cooley.com/news/insight/2025/2025-07-30-rhode-island-enacts-new-financial-institutions-cybersecurity-law-with-immediate-effectretrieved
  4. T3https://pivitstrategy.com/rhode-island-cybersecurity-laws-you-should-know-2026/retrieved
  5. T3https://www.hipaajournal.com/rhode-island-ri-bridges-system-hack/retrieved
  6. T3Rhode Island (S603) — Rhode Island (S603) — A standalone cybersecurity regime for DBR-licensed nonbank financial institutions, effective 2 July 2025, modeled on NYDFS Part 500 but with a 3-business-day (vs 72-hour) breach notification window.retrieved
  7. T3RIBridges state benefits system breach / Deloitte Consulting — RIBridges state benefits system breach / Deloitte Consulting — A $6.3 million settlement, with affected individuals eligible for up to $5,000 in reimbursement, illustrating practical breach-consequence exposure alongside RI's statutory regime.retrieved

#

Rhode Island permits credit-card surcharging up to 4% (following the 2012-13 national interchange antitrust settlement), subject to point-of-sale/entry disclosure norms, while debit and prepaid cards cannot be surcharged. A more aggressive Illinois-style bill to prohibit interchange fees on the tax/tip portion of transactions (H8212/S2522) was actively debated in the RI General Assembly through March 2026 but has not been enacted, drawing organized opposition from card-network and bank interests.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (7)
  1. T1https://www.ri.gov/press/view/21158retrieved
  2. T3https://merchantcostconsulting.com/lower-credit-card-processing-fees/credit-card-surcharge-laws-by-state/retrieved
  3. T1https://www.rilegislature.gov/Special/comdoc/House%20Corporations%202026/03-03-2026--H7607--Frank_McMahon(Interchange%20Legislation%20Materials)--cor.pdfretrieved
  4. T3https://intellipay.com/surcharge-interchange-fee-legislation-2026/retrieved
  5. T3https://www.paymentsdive.com/news/interchange-card-swipe-fee-state-legislature-bills-illinois/743826/retrieved
  6. T1Rhode Island merchants — Rhode Island merchants — Surcharge credit-card transactions up to 4% (post-2013 interchange antitrust settlement) subject to point-of-entry/point-of-sale disclosure; debit and prepaid cards cannot be surcharged.retrieved
  7. T1Rhode Island H8212/S2522 (interchange-fee-on-tax/tip prohibition) — Rhode Island H8212/S2522 (interchange-fee-on-tax/tip prohibition) — Pending as of March 2026 committee testimony (Illinois-modeled interchange restriction, opposed by card-network/bank interests warning of impact on ~9,000 US issuers and ~14,000 RI retailers); final 2026-session disposition not verified as of this cycle.retrieved

#

Rhode Island has no distinct state-level cross-border payment corridor regime; corridor access runs through nationally licensed money transmitters and banks (Western Union, Ria, Wells Fargo ExpressSend, Remitly, etc.) operating under the state's general Ch. 19-14/19-14.3 MTL framework. Providence's substantial Latin American/Caribbean immigrant population makes remittance outflow corridors (Dominican Republic, Guatemala, other Central America) a material but state-law-agnostic feature of the payments landscape.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T4https://www.sharemoney.com/us/en/state/rhode-islandretrieved
  2. T1https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/Statutes/TITLE19/19-14.3/19-14.3-1.htm
  3. T1Rhode Island cross-border payment corridors — Rhode Island cross-border payment corridors — Nationally licensed money transmitters and banks under the general Ch.19-14/19-14.3 MTL framework; no RI-specific corridor or remittance statute exists.retrieved

#

Rhode Island's payments-adjacent banking sector is anchored by Citizens Financial Group (Providence HQ, one of the nation's largest bank holding companies) and Washington Trust (the nation's oldest community bank, RI's largest state-chartered bank), alongside a cluster of community banks (BankRI, BankNewport, Centreville Bank) organized under the Rhode Island Bankers Association. A small but visible private fintech/mortgage-tech presence (e.g., Beeline Holdings) supplements the bank-dominated structure; no distinct nonbank PSP cluster of national scale is headquartered in the state.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (6)
  1. T3https://www.citizensbank.com/about-us/our-company/overview.aspxretrieved
  2. T3https://wallethub.com/banks/rhode-islandretrieved
  3. T2https://ribankers.com/retrieved
  4. T4https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/435258-10retrieved
  5. T3Citizens Financial Group — Citizens Financial Group — $226.4 billion in assets as of 31 Dec 2025, ~3,100 ATMs and ~1,000 branches across 14 states and DC; headquartered in Providence, RI.retrieved
  6. T3Washington Trust — Washington Trust — The oldest community bank in the nation and the largest state-chartered bank headquartered in Rhode Island.retrieved

The dominant live payments-adjacent litigation in Rhode Island as of mid-2026 is the multi-front dispute over prediction markets: AG Neronha's state-court suits against Kalshi and Polymarket alleging unlicensed sports gambling, met by Kalshi's federal suit against the state and a CFTC intervention asserting federal preemption over CFTC-designated contract markets. Historical consumer-protection enforcement (e.g., the Centurion Filing Services DTPA settlement) illustrates the AG's active use of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act against payment-adjacent deceptive schemes.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (7)
  1. T3https://www.wpri.com/money/lawsuit-targets-polymarket-kalshi-over-alleged-illegal-sports-gambling-in-ri/retrieved
  2. T3https://turnto10.com/i-team/kalshi-takes-court-action-against-rhode-island-officials-exchange-prediction-market-sports-betting-laws-federal-lawsuit-attorney-general-regulations-may-21-2026retrieved
  3. T3https://www.sportsbettingdime.com/news/betting/cftc-sues-rhode-island-to-block-prediction-market-lawsuits/retrieved
  4. T1https://riag.ri.gov/press-releases/following-enforcement-action-attorney-general-neronha-halts-deceptive-certificateretrieved
  5. T3Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha — Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha — Kalshi and Polymarket (21 May 2026, Providence County Superior Court) alleging their 'event contracts' constitute unlicensed sports gambling and casino gaming under state law.retrieved
  6. T3Kalshi — Kalshi — US District Court for the District of Rhode Island seeking a TRO/preliminary injunction, arguing the Commodity Exchange Act preempts state gambling law over CFTC-designated exchanges.retrieved
  7. T3CFTC — Rhode Island in the US District Court for the District of Rhode Island to halt state enforcement against CFTC-designated contract markets.retrieved

#

Rhode Island has no distinct state-level merchant-acquirer or ISO licensing regime; payment processors settling funds on behalf of merchants generally fall under the general currency-transmission licensing exemption for processing/clearing/settlement performed for exempt persons, or otherwise must hold the standard Currency Transmitter License. Merchant risk management (chargeback thresholds, MATCH-list exposure, high-risk MCC treatment) in Rhode Island operates entirely at the card-network level (Visa VAMP, Mastercard ECM/MATCH) rather than through bespoke state rules.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T1https://law.justia.com/codes/rhode-island/title-19/chapter-19-14-3/section-19-14-3-1/retrieved
  2. T4https://koronapos.com/blog/high-risk-merchant-accounts/retrieved
  3. T1Rhode Island payment processors — Rhode Island payment processors — Participation is limited to processing/clearing/settlement solely for transactions between persons already exempt from RI's currency-transmission licensing requirement; no distinct state acquirer/ISO regime exists.retrieved

#

Rhode Island's product-innovation activity centers on responsive consumer-protection regulation of crypto kiosks (2025-26 legislative cycle) rather than a dedicated state fintech sandbox or open-banking initiative -- no RI-government-run regulatory sandbox was identified. Innovation activity is otherwise driven by private-sector participants (Beeline, Citizens Bank's digital platforms) and regional ecosystem events (Boston Fintech Week, CIC Providence) rather than state policy.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T3https://thepublicsradio.org/business/new-bill-aims-to-regulate-crypto-atms-in-rhode-island/retrieved
  2. T4https://leadiq.com/c/citizens/5a1d8a9624000024006455acretrieved
  3. T1https://dbr.ri.gov/banking-securities-and-charitable-organizations/bankingretrieved
  4. T1Rhode Island DBR — Rhode Island DBR — A dedicated state fintech regulatory sandbox or open-banking mandate; innovation-adjacent activity is limited to licensing modernization (partial MTMA adoption).retrieved

#

Consumer protection in Rhode Island payments runs through the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (RI Gen. Laws Ch. 6-13.1), enforced by the AG's Consumer Protection Unit, with a targeted 2026 extension addressing authorized-payment fraud specific to crypto kiosks (reimbursement rights modeled on credit-card fraud protections for 'new' kiosk users). The Telephone Sales Solicitation Act adds a registration/enforcement layer relevant to telemarketing-driven payment fraud.

Movement — NEWRI 2025 crypto-ATM consumer-protection law confirmed with fraud-refund mechanismFirst-write baseline capture for this JID.
Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (9)
  1. T1https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/Statutes/TITLE6/6-13.1/INDEX.htmretrieved
  2. T1https://www.ri.gov/press/view/26301retrieved
  3. T3https://www.governing.com/policy/fearing-scams-states-add-regulations-to-crypto-atmsretrieved
  4. T3https://www.oceanstatemedia.org/the-publics-radio/new-bill-aims-to-regulate-crypto-atms-in-rhode-islandretrieved
  5. T3https://www.alfainternational.com/compendium/business-litigation-2/telephone-consumer-protection-act-tcpa/rhode-island/retrieved
  6. T4Rhode Island crypto-ATM law (2025) — Rhode Island crypto-ATM law (2025) — New-customer fraud victims can receive a full refund if fraud is reported to law enforcement within 90 days of first kiosk transaction; existing customers recover transaction fees onlyretrieved
  7. T3Rhode Island crypto-ATM law (2025) — Rhode Island crypto-ATM law (2025) — Each crypto ATM operator must register with the RI Department of Business Regulation as a money transmitterretrieved
  8. T1Rhode Island 2025 crypto-kiosk law — Rhode Island 2025 crypto-kiosk law — Fraud-reimbursement rights for 'new' kiosk users (first transaction within the past 30 days), explicitly modeled on how financial institutions refund credit-card fraud victims.retrieved
  9. T1Rhode Island Attorney General Consumer Protection Unit — Rhode Island Attorney General Consumer Protection Unit — The Deceptive Trade Practices Act (RI Gen. Laws Ch. 6-13.1) against unfair/unlawful business practices, including payments-adjacent deceptive schemes (e.g., the Centurion Filing Services settlement).retrieved

#

W11 baseline content is Sentinel.gi-fed per WPM methodology; no dedicated Sentinel.gi payments-context bulletin specific to US-RI was retrievable in this collection pass. The standing AML posture embedded in RI's payments regime is the statutory requirement that currency-transmission licensees maintain active FinCEN/BSA registration and comply with federal AML program requirements as a condition of state licensure, with active federal prosecutions in the District of Rhode Island illustrating enforcement reality.

Open gap — wpm-int-2W11 AML/CFT is a subscribed slot supplied by financial_integrity; no first-party world-payments source was sought this cycle.no under-indexing note recorded
No sub-brief written this cycleThe module carries open gaps but no narrative analysis was authored this cycle. Flagged for the next research pass.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (8)
  1. T1https://www.justice.gov/usao-ri/pr/california-man-pleads-guilty-role-multi-million-dollar-money-laundering-conspiracyretrieved
  2. T?FIM (sentinel.gi) per-JID baseline profile — United States — Rhode Island — RI operates under the federal BSA/AML/OFAC framework administered by FinCEN and Treasury, plus state money-transmitter licensing (incl. virtual currency) via the RI Department of Business Regulation, Division of Banking. Casino BSA compliance covers the state's two commercial casinos. RI is excluded from FinCEN's Residential Real Estate GTO program, and the March 2025 CTA rollback exempted RI-formed entities from federal beneficial-ownership reporting.
  3. T?FIM (sentinel.gi) gaps_register_cumulative (issue FIM-BASE-GAP-004) — Gap: sourcing-thinness
  4. T?FIM (sentinel.gi) gaps_register_cumulative (issue FIM-BASE-GAP-003) — Gap: capacity-deficit
  5. T1FIM (sentinel.gi) sanctions_change_register (issue FIM-BASE-SANC-001) — Sanctions: OFAC listing
  6. T?FIM (sentinel.gi) gaps_register_cumulative (issue FIM-BASE-GAP-002) — Gap: regulatory-failure
  7. T1Rhode Island currency transmission licensees — Rhode Island currency transmission licensees — Active FinCEN registration and BSA compliance (31 U.S.C. 5311 et seq.) as a statutory condition of state licensure.retrieved
  8. T1US Attorney's Office, District of Rhode Island — US Attorney's Office, District of Rhode Island — A BEC/wire-fraud money-laundering conspiracy (guilty plea Dec 2025) that defrauded victims, including the Town of Bristol, of nearly $9 million.retrieved

#

Rhode Island has no state-specific correspondent-banking or settlement-access regulation; access runs through the federal AML/CDD framework applicable to all US correspondent relationships. The state's 1990-91 banking crisis (RISDIC collapse) is the formative historical reference point, after which all Rhode Island banks moved to federal deposit insurance -- a foundational condition for the state's current correspondent and settlement access via federally insured institutions such as Citizens Financial Group and Washington Trust.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T4https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhode_Island_banking_crisisretrieved
  2. T1https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF10873retrieved
  3. T3https://www.citizensbank.com/about-us/our-company/overview.aspxretrieved
  4. T1https://dbr.ri.gov/banking-securities-and-charitable-organizations/bankingretrieved
  5. T1Rhode Island community and regional banks — Rhode Island community and regional banks — Federal AML/CDD frameworks and correspondent relationships with super-regional partners (e.g., Citizens Financial Group), following the state's move to federal deposit insurance after the 1990-91 RISDIC collapse; no RI-specific correspondent-banking statute exists.retrieved

#

Trailing-12-month (July 2025-July 2026) commercial activity specific to Rhode Island-headquartered payments/fintech entities is limited; the clearest identified event is Providence-based Beeline's corporate deal with MagicBlocks in August 2025. Broader RI-linked commercial activity is dominated by Citizens Financial Group's ordinary-course corporate disclosures rather than discrete M&A/investment events within the window.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T4https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/435258-10retrieved
  2. T4Beeline (Providence, RI) — Beeline (Providence, RI) — A corporate deal with MagicBlocks on 21 August 2025; deal value undisclosed.retrieved
No modules match.

Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across groups.

Provenance and declared absence

Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.

Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.

Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.

Suppressed by doctrine: derived risk score; per-module RAG traffic light. Not shown on this page.

Band honesty: uncertainty bands are computed against a frozen build clock of 2026-11-04. A year-precision row is never promoted into a tighter band.

Orphan deltas: 0 cycle_delta row(s) target non-module objects and are listed in the rail rather than attached to a card.

Envelope: baseline resolved at jurisdiction_json.baseline; 14 module(s), 90 finding(s), 132 source(s) in the cumulative register.

Think something on this page is wrong? Report an error.